[lbo-talk] A highly critical take on Fitch

Nathan Newman nathanne at nathannewman.org
Wed Mar 15 04:08:08 PST 2006


----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Henwood" <dhenwood at panix.com> -I've got a paper around somewhere that points out that dispersed -ownership, as in the predominantly English-speaking countries, is a -more hostile environment for social democracy, since it's pitiless in -its demands for cost-cutting and labor flexibility. Ownership in the -soc dem countries is more concentrated.

But that doesn't fully explain the lack of social democracy in America in the time of the trusts and monopolies, when ownership was quite concentrated and coordinated. That may be true now, but we have been talking about why unions were defeated and made more conservative in the mold of Sam Gompers, which happened in the time of massive corporate concentration and very little discipline from Wall Street in the sense of dispersed ownership.

-- Nathan Newman



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list