>I usually think that Chuck's contributions are worthless, but this one is at
>least valuable as a case in point. Chuck is an individualist who doesn't
>want to be accountable to anyone else; considers democratic decision-making
>in a mass movement context "authoritarian"; and favors free-floating
>"leaderless" (feel free to laugh) groups of "activists" who will never
>organize masses of ordinary people because they are simply not interested in
>doing so.
Chuck is an anarchist. I'm not, and I frequently disagree with him, but it's a serious and honorable political philosophy. It's not worthless.
Doug