[lbo-talk] The lying liars who lie

andie nachgeborenen andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 28 14:29:33 PST 2006


No, but this sort of insertion is standard, happens all the time, and it's the sort of thing that makes one sympathetic with the Scalia-Easterbrook position that one should ignore "legislative history" and just read the text of the law. Which is mostly what district court judges and clerks do all the time, who has the time to look up USCCAAN and read the (possibily fictitious) legislative history?

--- Jordan Hayes <jmhayes at j-o-r-d-a-n.com> wrote:


> Has anyone else been following this? (thanks
> Kirsten!)
>
> /* ... */
>
>
>
http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/03/fictitious-kylgraham-floor-debate.html
>
>
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list