Doug also remarks that to be an intellectual in US politics today and also a successful politician, you have to have killed people, or give impression of being willing to kill or of having killed in living memory -- the thought is that Kerry and Gore killed in Vietnam but that was long ago and far away. Of course Bush dodged the draft in Vietnam, but maybe his massacre on Texas death row made up for it, and he didn't have to overcome the handicap of being an intellectual. Clinton, who wasn't particularly a killer, or at least not a very zealous one, was an intellectual -- a former law professor! -- and actually smart, but probably the deep fried accent and the trailer park manner lowered his IQ 25 points in the public mind, thu s compensating. So: It's OK to be an intellectual if you don't seem like one, even if you are not a killer, and it is OK to be a killer if ytou are not an intellectual, but seeming like an intellectual is a real obstacle even if you are a killer -- in fact, even if you volunteered when you could dodged (Gore, Kerry), or wewre a decorated war hero (Kerry).
A cheery thought.
--- Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
> andie nachgeborenen wrote:
>
> >Seems to me the Dems ought to be able to turn up a
> >semi-progressive evangelist
>
> The Pew data I just posted look like white
> evangelicals are a lost
> cause. They're now the base of the Republican Party,
> and it doesn't
> make any sense to go after them if you risk
> alienating your own base
> by doing so. Fuck 'em.
>
> Doug
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com