Just found this:
<blockquote>Republican chairman booed at AJCommittee event The chairman of the Republican Party was booed at an American Jewish Committee event over comments on Iraq.
Ken Mehlman, who is Jewish, said Iraq posed less of a challenge now than under Saddam Hussein.
Mehlman was otherwise politely received when he spoke Tuesday at the AJCommittee's 100th anniversary celebrations in Washington, and he got warm applause when he said the Bush administration would not tolerate an Iranian nuclear bomb and always would stand by Israel.
The room burst into applause, however, when AJCommittee board member Edith Everett asked Mehlman to "take a message" to President Bush to stop linking Israel and Iran.
"It does not help Israel and it does not help American Jews to appear to be stimulators of any action against Iran," Everett said.
(May 2, 2006, <http://jta.org/page_view_breaking_story.asp?intid=2450>)</blockquote>
Now, if it doesn't help American Jews to "appear to be stimulators of any action against Iran," isn't it worse for establishment Jews to be _actually_ stimulating an action on Sudan, when they have no control whatsoever over what Bush actually do, against the interests of Jewish communities?
On 5/3/06, Jim Farmelant <farmelantj at juno.com> wrote:
> It may be the case that the "bad politics of the organizers"
> is best explained without reference to religion. However,
> that certainly doesn't stop those very same organizers from exploiting
> appeals to ethnic and religious solidarity to enforce
> political conformity on certain issues.
If the "Save Darfur" rally had been entirely or chiefly organized by evangelicals, it would have been simply laughable. It's Jewish historical experience -- namely the Holocaust -- that lends moral capital to evangelicals and Bush. Lending that moral capital to the Empire is what Eli Wiesel does professionally: e.g., <http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/dunbarortiz121005.html>.
-- Yoshie <http://montages.blogspot.com/> <http://mrzine.org> <http://monthlyreview.org/>