> Get your own word for it, I say; otherwise you'll make the
> distinction (between genocide and not-genocide) meaningless. I
> think it's useful to have the word genocide around, with its narrow
> definition. Because that kind of behavior does exist, and it's
> important to deal with that as such.
Like that word 'fascist' of similar recent disagreement. There does seem to be a determination to reserve these terms for an 'other'.
Martin