[lbo-talk] AJC: "it does not help American Jews to appear to be stimulators of any action agains

Michael Hoover hooverm at scc-fl.edu
Sat May 6 12:53:13 PDT 2006



>>> dhenwood at panix.com 05/06/06 12:19 PM >>>
Yes and no - it's neither one nor the other, but full of contradictions. Christian Parenti writes from Colombia, where he's researching a piece for The Nation, quoting a local left politico: "To run for office from the left in colombia, you have to be willing to die." Now that's a real plutocracy. In the US, to run for office from the left, you have to be willing to risk mocking press coverage or none at all. Yeah, the big guys dominate the public sphere, and a couple of centuries of bourgeois common sense have been drilled into our heads, but we're not terrorized and we're not powerless. You have to take seriously the possibility that many, maybe most, Americans are pretty satisfied with the status quo. Doug <<<<<>>>>>

plutocracy is concentration of political power in hands of wealthy, compatible with variety of governing forms, including but not restricted to those in which opposition has to fear dying if contesting an election...

u.s. system could be characterized as a duopoly (although that may allow for a bit too much difference in what is essentially a modified one-party system)...

and some might point out that u.s. system will respond to well-financed/well-organized interest groups, that social movements of various kinds can sometimes wrest significant concessions from elites, and that elections can, on occasion, have substantive significance...

however, most of the time elections serve to confer legitimacy on whichever elites (or representatives thereof) get the most votes...

as for elite use of repression, well, there's *enforcing* slave laws, committing genocide against indigenous peoples, firing, harrassing, and - yes - even murdering labor leaders, destroying socialist party, interning japanese, witchhunting labor and left, intimidating civil rights & anti-war activists (gee, that stuff pretty much adds up to the whole of u.s. history)...

of course, above examples are generally cited as unfortunate/ particular instances in otherwise democratic past, after all, even some quite harsh critics allow that there have been no readily identifiable coups d'etat, heck, the constitution has never even been suspended (although some of its provisions have clearly been ignored), on other hand, u.s. has actively destroyed democracy throughout its so-called 'sphere of influence'...

for u.s. 'democratic' elites, only that which poses no real threat to their property/power/privilege/position can be allowed, thus, their history of repression has been accompanied by a history of manipulation, hence, importance of elections as symbolic exercises... mh

Please Note: Due to Florida's very broad public records law, most written communications to or from College employees regarding College business are public records, available to the public and media upon request. Therefore, this e-mail communication may be subject to public disclosure.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list