Maybe you could elaborate why you think Heidegger's anti-science approach is "good " ?
Charles <<<<<>>>>>
i'm not chris, i've not been following this thread, and i'm not big on heidegger, but i don't think he was anti-science per se, as i recall, he claimed that philosophical conceptions of human nature were mistaken, this had resulted in technological dominance over human existence, better - according to him - was recognition of 'human essence' as 'realm of disclosure', this would ostensibly allow people to escape the dominance of technology by developing a more receptive relationship to *being* (with a capital b), his term for self-conscious existence, the meaning of which was fundamental to his philosophy...
reading over above, i have no idea what any of it means... mh
Please Note: Due to Florida's very broad public records law, most written communications to or from College employees regarding College business are public records, available to the public and media upon request. Therefore, this e-mail communication may be subject to public disclosure.