> No doubt. All these things are true. But the story of white treatment of
> the Indians is horrible enough - why did Churchill have to invent,
> exaggerate, and plagiarize? It's a sad thing.
How do you know this? Take for example the charge that Churchill wrongly stated that the American governent deliberately infected natives with smallpox blankets. Obviously, this is a matter of some contention. What kind of records exist? If this is a subject of debate between academics, then why is Churchill guilty of stating his position on the issue?
Chuck0 -------------------------- Bread and Roses Web Design serving small businesses, non-profits, artists and activists http://www.breadandrosesweb.com/