To put it differently and more simply, your objection to the analogy fails because you are thinking of it this way:
disease is to doctors as law is to lawyers
when the analogies are really:
disease is to drs as conflict is lawyers medicine is to doctors as law is to lawyers.
The analogy is therefore correct and appropriate.
2. Lawyers don't per se, create law -- legislators and agency officials do. Once upon a time judges made up a lot of legal rules -- the common law -- and state court judges still have this power, but don't really use it that much. Law is mostly legislation and regulation. Many of these laws are initially drafted by lawyers in their capacity, typically, as lobbyists, but in that capacity the point is not to benefit the legal profession but their corporate masters. Obviously the rules are influenced by those with power in our society. These people are not lawyers as lawyers, who merely serve the powerful in the main.
4
> At 4:18 PM -0500 20/5/06, jthorn65 at sbcglobal.net
> wrote:
>
> >Again however you trot out the MD analogy but
> doctors do not
> >primarily do this. This is not the primary let
> alone only reason for
> >their existence. It is a recent aspect thanks to
> capitalism. They
> >study and interpret physical systems, biology and
> chemistry. They
> >don't create diseases that only they can cure.
>
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com