Gar Lipow wrote:
>
> The problem is that credits are based not on proven reductions, but on
> claims that without carbon credits the situation would be worse. A
> highly toxic landfill in Durban, South Africa gained credits for
> keeping the dump open, and burning methane from the landfill to
> generate electricity onsite. Consultants determined that only
> plausible alternative was to generate electricity from coal. Shutting
> down the site, and saving same amount of electricity through
> efficiency measures was ruled out as implausible. So was purifying
> site methane and selling it to the local gas company.
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pbond.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 185 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <../attachments/20061010/85d6eb69/attachment.vcf>