Another article that rips into Hofstadter, though if memory serves more time spent on Lipset, Bell, Glazer, Parsons in the Radical Right volume from Doubleday.
http://newleftreview.org/?page=article&view=1592
>... New Left Review I/128, July-August 1981
Alan Wolfe Sociology, Liberalism, and the Radical Right
Ronald Reagan is the first American president of the twentieth century whose political origins do not lie in the broad consensual centre of American politics. Only time will tell whether Reagan will remain true to his oft-expressed conservative beliefs or whether, for the sake of political peace, his administration will soften its revanchiste instincts. But whatever the course adopted after 1980, the fact that a man so recently defined as an 'extremist' could win the presidency—especially after the defeats of Barry Goldwater in 1964 and George McGovern in 1972 seemed to confirm those who argued that only a 'moderate' could be elected president—compels a re-examination of what was once called 'the radical right'. Reagan's ability to make a popular case for conservative themes, combined with the visible role played in both his campaign and his administration by right-wing activists, does not lend much credence to the view expressed by Richard Rovere in 1962 that radical right organizations symbolize 'frantic efforts to prevent ultra-conservatism from dying out' [1] or S. M. Lipset's prediction that 'it is extremely doubtful that the radical right will grow beyond the peak of 1953–54.' [2]
Another Wolfe piece. I recommend the Ellis book for the documentation, at least. The sections on Earth First, radical feminism and SDS gather in one place tons of embarrassing sheeit. "Is Liberalism Now Exhausted?" Review of The Dark Side of the Left, by Richard J. Ellis. Liberalism and its Discontents, Alan Brinkley. Times Literary Supplement 22 May 1998: 11-12.