On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Chuck Grimes wrote:
> It's something else that I can't quite put my finger on. It has
> something to do with the idea that first of all the people of this
> country or at least the voters put these jerks in power, when it was
> promised to be a very bad idea in the first place. Now that it has
> finally, some six years too late dawned on enough of them, that yes,
> it was a bad thing to do and they put them in for bad reasons. The
> elected jerks might go, but the people who put them in haven't
> changed.
What element of the higher circles - what would-be element - has such immorality not touched? Perhaps all those cases that come briefly to public attention are but marginal - or, at any rate, those that were caught. But then, there is the feeling that the bigger you are, the less likely you are to be caught. There is the feeling that all the petty cases seem to signify something grander, that they go deeper and that their roots are now well organized in the higher and middle American ways of life. But among the mass distractions this feeling soon passes harmlessly away. For the American distrust of the high and mighty is a distrust without doctrine and without political focus; it is a distrust felt by the mass public as a series of more or less cynically expected disclosures. Corruption and immoralities, petty and grand, are facts about the higher circles, often even characteristic facts about many of them. But the immoral tone of American society today also involves the lack of public sensibility when confronted with these facts. Effective moral indignation is not evoked by the corrupt public life of our time; the old middle-class moralities have been replaced in America by the higher immorality.
[...]
'Crisis' is a bankrupted term, because so many men in high places have evoked it in order to cover up their extraordinary policies and deeds; as a matter of fact, it is precisely the absence of crises that is a cardinal feature of the higher immorality. For genuine crises involve situations in which men at large are presented with genuine alternatives, the moral meanings of which are clearly opened to public debate. The higher immorality, the general weakening of older values and the organization of ir responsibility have not involved any public crises; on the contrary, they have been matters of a creeping indifference and a silent hollowing out.
- C Wright Mills, The Power Elite, pp. 341, 345