[lbo-talk] Re: dd on microcredit

boddi satva lbo.boddi at gmail.com
Tue Oct 17 01:13:17 PDT 2006


I think it's not a question of fairness as such, but a question of connectedness. Those who would use money in a way that they could pay it back are moving their communties in the direction of interdependency. Obviously there is not enough aid to go around, so the aid should be used where it will have lasting, knock-on benefits.

Of course micro-credit isn't a miracle, but it does offer hope to connect poor people to the financial system so that they are not so cash-poor that it hobbles their development.

Boddi

On 10/16/06, Daniel Davies <d_squared_2002 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Joanna wrote:
>
> >>We've tried fairness for the last fifty years and it didn't work...?
>
> That one must have passed me by I guess. But now that we know it doesn't
> work, I suppose we must forge ahead.<<
>
> A somewhat flippant remark I agree but one I will stand by in the context of
> aid policy, on exactly the same grounds that JKG first made this point. Even
> allowing for the politicisation of aid, overstating of amounts, promises not
> kept, etc etc, I find it hard to take seriously the idea that anyone can look
> at the policy of distributing aid on a purely needs-based basis over the last
> fifty years and say that it's working, even a little bit. Not all of those
> stories about villages refusing to build a tin shack to store grain because
> they heard that the next door village got one ready made for free are untrue.
> The research on private education versus public in Kenya can't be dismissed as
> hot air. I think that Galbraith's theory of the "non-adapted minority" has a
> lot of truth to it here, as well as some of the facts about the socially and
> psychologically destructive effects of the dole, summed up in a piece by Noel
> Pearson that Rob Schaap (yo Rob) sent to the list a long while ago:
>
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/2000/2000-September/016135.html
>
> Now it might in principle be the case that in an ideal world of justice where
> the Third World had never been a secondary theatre of the Cold War, or where
> reasonable reparations had been paid for the destruction of the colonial era,
> that needs-based aid would work just fine. But if we're waiting around for
> that then we might as well wait for world socialist revolution. Distributing
> (development, non-emergency) aid on the basis of willingness to make use of it
> is an inegalitarian policy, but it at least deserves a try as potentially a
> less horrifically wasteful way to go about things.
>
> best
> dd
>
>
>
> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list