On Oct 18, 2006, at 10:14 PM, Michael Pollak wrote:
> It looks to me like if you move it out one more month, it's now got
> two fascinating features. The first is how incredibly close the
> two things have tracked for six years. And the second is how, for
> the first time, they are suddenly now diverging drastically.
>
> (Although it would be nice to see how drastic it actually is after
> the log function is added.)
Bush "should be" at 45%; instead, he's at 37%.