[lbo-talk] David Brooks and the limits of knowledge

Carl Remick carlremick at hotmail.com
Sat Oct 21 09:55:41 PDT 2006


Predictably David Brooks emits a lather of blather in reviewing Andrew Sullivan's "The Conservative Soul [!] : How We Lost It, How to Get It Back" in the NY Times, but this is a particular standpoint:

"Over the past few years I’ve watched Sullivan’s pessimism about Iraq lead to a broader re-examination of politics and ideas. As he’s made this journey, I’ve come to regard him as a traveling companion. He’s been more honest and open-minded than just about anybody else on the right. He is certainly correct that conservatives have to rediscover epistemological modesty. Conservatives need to relearn the lessons of Burke and Hayek — that the world is complex, and efforts to transform it will have unintended consequences, most of them bad."

<http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/22/books/review/Brooks.t.html?_r=1&ref=books&oref=slogin>

I love Brooks' implied conclusion that because the US fucked up royally in waging an imperialistic war on Iraq, *any* effort to transform the world -- say, through peaceful promulgation of socialism -- is pointless because of unintended consequences, most of them bad. Ah, the complexity of it all!

Carl

_________________________________________________________________ Add a Yahoo! contact to Windows Live Messenger for a chance to win a free trip! http://www.imagine-windowslive.com/minisites/yahoo/default.aspx?locale=en-us&hmtagline



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list