I also liked his (very dry) sense of humor.
Joanna
Doug Henwood wrote:
>
> On Oct 25, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Jerry Monaco wrote:
>
>> We all have our superstitions and for some reason one of yours is that
>> Marx's Capital provides knowledge of something in the real world.
>> Capital is worth reading for its way of thinking, but the model
>> matches nothing that we can point to today and didn't match much of
>> 19th century English Capitalism, either. There were a few insights,
>> but nothing that is worth calling a "theory", except in a very loose
>> everyday sense.
>
>
> I must rise to Marx's defense! I have to confess to never being able
> to get through Capital Vol. 2, but Vols. 1 and 3 are splendid. The
> structure of his analysis is thoroughly compelling, and revealing:
> starting from the simple commodity and expanding cumulatively into
> the social system that both produces it and grows up around it - the
> factory, imperialism, finance. The antagonistic nature of capitalist
> production, the structure of classes, the control of labor, the role
> of the state, the division of surplus value into profit/interest/rent
> - that's all applicable to the world of 2006. More relevant, in some
> ways, because capitalism has pervaded almost every nook and cranny of
> the earth, and even our consciousness, far more than in the mid-19C.
>
> Doug
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>