Why Hemingway Is Chick-Lit By Lakshmi Chaudhry
When women stop reading, the novel will be dead, declared Ian McEwan in the Guardian last year. The British novelist reached this rather dire conclusion after venturing into a nearby park in an attempt to give away free novels. The result?
Only one sensitive male soul took up his offer, while every woman he approached was eager and grateful to do the same.
Unscientific as McEwans experiment may be, its thesis is borne out by a number of surveys conducted in Britain, the United States and Canada, where men account for a paltry 20 percent of the market for fiction. Unlike the gods of the literary establishment who remain predominantly maleboth as writers and criticstheir humble readers are overwhelmingly female.
In recent years, various pundits have used this so-called fiction gap as an opportunity to trot out their pet theories on what makes men and women tick. The most recent is New York Times columnist David Brooks, who jumped at the chance to peddle his special brand of gender essentialism. His June 11 column arbitrarily divided all books into neat boy/girl categoriesIn the mens sections of the bookstore, there are books describing masterly men conquering evil. In the womens sections there are novels about
well, I guess feelings and stuff. His sweeping assertion flies in the face of publishing industry research, which shows that if chick-lit were defined as what women read, the term would have to include most novels, including those considered macho territory. A 2000 survey found that women comprised a greater percentage of readers than men across all genres: Espionage/thriller (69 percent); General (88 percent); Mystery/Detective (86 percent); and even Science Fiction (52 percent).
[...]
[More at URL above.]