Judging from the article, it seems Local 1199 grew primarily through mergers and not organizing. If that is the case, then they are hardly a model in a right to work state or in an unorganized sector.
I would also point out that the justification for the CTW split from the AFL-CIO was that more money needed to be spent on organizing. The evidence contained in the article I posted suggests that it is business as usual in one highly visible and infuential component of the new federation.
Well, I am indeed glad that local 1199 is subsidizing the work of other more fledgling locals, lilke your own, trying to organize - if indeed that is what they are doing.
However it is impossible for me to buy the notion that it is anti-union to criticize the policies of labor officials.SR
-------------- Original message -------------- From: "Jim Straub" rustbeltjacobin at gmail.com
But I'll ALSO say that in my local's organizing, which is in a right to work state in a local with a bigger battle in front of us than we can afford to fight, is directly subsidized by 1199 NY--- their members kick money to ours, so vegas can build power eventually like theirs have. I'm always all in favor of cost-cutting and frugality and not giving the center for union facts or anti-union lbo-talk writers more ammunition. But I find it offensive and laughable that this is what passes for news about unions on this list.
Blech. Jim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20060926/5aaa13c7/attachment.htm> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Jim Straub" <rustbeltjacobin at gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Union top Dennis Rivera: "No one throws a party Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:50:14 +0000 Size: 622 URL: <../attachments/20060926/5aaa13c7/attachment.eml>