While I appreciate the realities of expropriating surplus value and
funneling it back to the workers, I would also think it possible
to be able to do this within a civil libertarian context. A worker should
be able to say, "Chavez sucks" without being thrown in the slammer
for an uttered thought crime. After all, if we don't know why other workers
might say, "Chavez sucks", we wouldn't be able to solve the problem or
clear the air which generated such a thought. If it is just, "Chavez sucks because
my employer is unhappy or the religious authorties don't like seeing
the women going to school (a la Afghanistan) then, we can ignore
the comment. But, if it is something akin to, "Chavez sucks because
he is siphoning money into a secret Swiss bank account....." well, that's
another matter.
Best,
Mike B)
Read "Penguins in Bondage": http://happystiletto.blogspot.com/
--------------------------------- How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20060926/48986972/attachment.htm>