<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
So Woj I take it by "predictive power" you mean (as we are talking
about the social sciences here) that the LTV to qualify as a real
social scientific theory would have to be capable of specifying the key
explanatory variable(s) (eg. R) that are responsible for the direction
of change in a dependent variable (eg. Y). Where R is total profits
and Y is total output. But more than this a good social scientific
theory should also be able to explain the origin and the magnitude of
the independent variable (in our example R). Now this is really the
nub of the LTV. It supplies a plausible and testable theory for both R
and Y. I am more than happy to prepare a bibliography of more of the
empirical tests of the LTV if you would like but these should get you
started. <br>
<br>
Perhaps you could start here. "The Golden Age Illusion: Rethinking
Postwar Capitalism" M. Webber and D. Rigby. <br>
<br>
For a more theoretically orientated discussion start here: "The New
Value Controversy and the Foundations of Economics" Edited by Freeman,
Kliman and Wells. See in this volume "The Case for Simplicity: a
Paradigm for the Political Economy of the 21st century" Alan Freeman.<br>
<br>
For less lengthy empirical tests see :<br>
<p><font color="#bb0000"
face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="1"><b><font
color="black"
face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="2">The
Empirical Strength of the Labor Theory of Value<br>
</font></b><font color="#bb0000"
face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="1"><font
color="#bb0000"
face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="1"><font
color="black"
face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="2">(1998)
</font></font></font><font color="black"
face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="2">in
<i>Conference Proceedings of Marxian Economics: A Centenary Appraisal</i>,
Riccardo Bellofiore (ed.), Macmillan, London</font><font color="black"
face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="1"> [<a
href="http://homepage.newschool.edu/%7EAShaikh/labthvalue.pdf">Download
PDF 584KB</a>]</font></font></p>
Also on the SNA see<br>
<p><font color="#bb0000"
face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="1"><b><font
color="black"
face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="2">Measuring
the Wealth of Nations: The Political Economy of National Accounts </font></b><font
color="black"
face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="2"><font
color="#bb0000"
face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="1"><font
color="#000000"
face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="2">(1994)
co-authored with E. Ahmet Tonak, </font></font>Cambridge University
Press.</font></font><br>
<font color="#bb0000"
face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="1"><font
color="black"
face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular" size="1">[<a
href="http://homepage.newschool.edu/%7EAShaikh/wealth.pdf">Download
Ch. 1 PDF 140KB</a>]<br>
</font></font></p>
For a reasonable treatment on the Connection between SV and the Profit
Rate and therefore the LTV see:<br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="2"><b><a
href="http://home.mtholyoke.edu/%7Efmoseley/Working_Papers_PDF/RRPE.pdf">The
Rate of Profit and the Future of Capitalism </a></b></font><a
href="http://home.mtholyoke.edu/%7Efmoseley/Working_Papers_PDF/RRPE.pdf"><b><font
size="2">in <i>Review of Radical Political Economics</i>, 1997</font></b></a><br>
<br>
These should get you started.<br>
<br>
Enjoy<br>
<br>
Travis<br>
<br>
<br>
Wojtek Sokolowski wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid0ITC0097KLUD97@jhuml3.jhu.edu" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Travis:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Woj now just confess your faith in the doctrine of
comparative advantage and you will have fulfilled all the
requirements for a degree in economics. Who knows maybe you
could get a Nobel prize by arguing that people do not always
have perfect information but act as though they do. Really
your capacity to wax certain on the LTOV would be amazing if
only your post did not read like a quote out of "economic
polemics for dummies".
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
So what is exactly that you are saying? That I am wrong and that the LTV
does have predictive power? If so, what did it predict? Please do tell, I
am all ears.
Wojtek
___________________________________
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk">http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>