<html><body>
<DIV>Years ago, in the 1990s, I recall seeing statistics about the average wages of lawyers in the State of California. I was shocked - it was way less than 30 k. The explanation being that many lawyers in this state don't work as lawyers or only do so part time. In California, at </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR>From: andie nachgeborenen <andie_nachgeborenen@yahoo.com> <BR><BR>> You're averaging data from people at high powered <BR>> firms and from big schools who earn big money and the <BR>> rest of lawyers, who do not. I'd be surprised if most <BR>> my Ohio State classmateswere making more than $65K. <BR>> Btw, a starting Public Defender or Asst State's Atty <BR>> in Chicago makes around $30K, how do you like them <BR>> apples? The ACLU pays more. It pays more to be a <BR>> public school teacher in a poor district. <BR>> <BR>> Anyway, even if most lawyers made $200,000 a year, <BR>> they are still going be less likely to take <BR>> contingency lawsuits most of which they are going to <BR>> lose anyway if they are limited to fees and 1/3 of <BR>> compensatory damages. Before you advocate <BR>> deprivatizing punitives, just bear that in mind. <BR>> <BR>> --- info@pulpculture.org wrote: <BR></BLOCKQUOTE></body></html>