<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
Wojtek Sokolowski wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid0IVK006KSNE452@jhuml3.jhu.edu">
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Stated differently, I have been arguing all the way that the only way for
the left to become a noticeable (if not major) political force in this
country is to start building major national political and cultural
instituions representing its view point - starting with the available
institutional resources: unions, Democrats, liberal civil society
organizations, left leaning organized religion, etc. - even is they seem
inadequate in a long run. This is what the Repugs did and won.</pre>
</blockquote>
Yes and no. There was plenty of grass-roots activism from the left, plenty
of women's groups, plenty of consciousness raising, plenty of community and
environment protection groups, etc. But the bottom line is that the Repugs
are supporting the status quo (or worse) and have funding that exceeds that
of the left by several degrees of magnitude and that the left opposes the
status quo and lacks comparable funding. And the repugs have the armed forces
and the police on their side. Consider what happened at the neo-nazi rally
in Florida last week: the nazis marched in a black neighborhood shouting
racial slurs and proclaiming white power and were protected by the police
while the counter demonstrators were arrested.<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid0IVK006KSNE452@jhuml3.jhu.edu">
<pre wrap=""> The
"traditional" forms of left "activistism" - clowning in the streets, cursing
at the officials whom you want to take your side, shocking people or
insulting their common sense, smashing windows, or rioting may add a feather
or two to the caps of the more macho "activistists" - but it is totally
counterproductive form of "organizing." IMHO, it is the main reason why the
Left is so unpopular today - it grossly overplayed the "in your face" card
and was caught with their pants down while the world around them changed
profoundly. </pre>
</blockquote>
Then how do you account for the success and dissemination of "in-your-face"
repug/conservative verbiage and posturing? Anne Coulter, Geraldo, Bill Reily,
etc.. IT's exactly what you're complaining about, but seems to have great
appeal and to have set the standard for "debate" and public speech in this
country.<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid0IVK006KSNE452@jhuml3.jhu.edu">
<pre wrap=""> Joanna</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>