Judging by Metacritic scores, United 93 has been reviewed as better than Brokeback Mountain.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/28/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jordan Hayes</b> <<a href="mailto:jmhayes@speakeasy.net">
jmhayes@j-o-r-d-a-n.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">> Been reading about the new film, "United 93," and wondered
<br>> of anyone here believes that it was shot down.<br><br>Here's my take on it: the ATC chatter you pointed to shows pretty<br>clearly that there were still plenty of aircraft in the sky at the point<br>where UA 93 went down. There's was also a lot of discussion on the
<br>radio between the controller(s) and those aircraft. United has a<br>service where you can listen to the current ATC frequency that the plane<br>you're on is listening to on "Channel 9", and I've listened many times;
<br>there is often this kind of collaborative conversation going on about<br>things on the ground like fires, weather, other planes, etc. --<br>sometimes even just landmarks ("What's that big bridge down there?").
<br><br>Two items:<br><br>- If there were fighters in the air nearby, they would have HAD to be in<br>contact with the controller for that sector. The controller, even up to<br>the time that the smoke on the ground is seen, does not appear to have
<br>any idea that UA 93 had been hijacked. He continues to try to raise UA<br>93 and doesn't hide the fact that he (and others) heard someone say<br>"There's a bomb on board, we're going back to the airport" ... if he had
<br>realized that it was a hijacker mistakenly transmitting on ATC rather<br>than on the PA, he might not have let the hijacker(s) know that's what<br>he was doing.<br><br>He also does not communicate with anything military, nor give traffic
<br>advisories to the other aircraft about anything military in the area.<br>Military aircraft often (but not always) use a different frequency to<br>talk to ATC (for technical reasons, not for anything 'secretive'), but<br>
ATC uses "simulcasting" to talk back to them on both the military<br>frequency and the civilian one, because it's useful to the other pilots<br>around to know that there's military aircraft in the area.<br><br>- If there were fighters in the area, and on frequency, there's a dozen
<br>or so pilots out there who are keeping this quiet (plus a whole room at<br>Cleveland Center). That seems very unlikely to me.<br><br>The ATC MP3 was heavily edited and time-compressed; if anyone knows of a<br>source of a longer one, I'd be interested to hear it.
<br><br>/jordan<br><br>___________________________________<br><a href="http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk">http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>J T. Ramsay<br>1626 S. 2nd St. #2<br>Philadelphia, PA 19148<br>cell: 267 252 0852<br><a href="http://blackmailismylife.com/blog">blackmailismylife.com/blog</a> [NEW!]