The system operating in the visual arts is not for the most part, an apprentice system. These workers have much more in common with contemporary factory workers than with medieval craft guilds. Greg gboozell@juno.com -- joanna <123hop@comcast.net> wrote: This division is as old as art itself -- the masterpieces of the Renaissance were often constructed in studios where apprentice, journeymen, and master artists worked together to 'create' the finished piece. There is nothing wrong with this system so long as the apprentices get to be journeymen and the journeymen get to be masters. They say it takes a solid ten years to learn any craft. You might as well be productive while you're learning. The problem with the system now is that this upward mobility is vanishing. There are still arts that use it, for example ballet, but mostly the star system is coming to govern academia and the arts. Joanna gboozell@juno.com wrote: >What part did you find depressing - that many artists don't fabricate >their own work - or that anonymous assistants do most or the fabrication work (they failed to mention the shitty pay that often >comes along with the job) - or...? > >Greg Boozell >gboozell@juno.com > > > > >-- John Adams wrote: >This was weirdly, depressingly interesting to read: >http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/07/arts/design/07fine.html? >_r=1&th=&oref=slogin&emc=th&pagewanted=print > >___________________________________ >http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk > > > >___________________________________ >http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk > > > ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk