<div>And that would be "complimentary," although it's not satisfactorily complementary, either. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Mike<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/7/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Michael Hirsch</b> <<a href="mailto:mmh655@gmail.com">mmh655@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>
<div>I always thought "Dog" was the accepted male equivalent for "slut." Yes, it doesn't have the sting of opprobrium as does "slut," but it's hardly complementary. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Mike Hirsch<br><br> </div></div>
<div><span class="e" id="q_10bafaf8646cdc51_1">
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/7/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">andie nachgeborenen</b> <<a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:andie_nachgeborenen@yahoo.com" target="_blank">andie_nachgeborenen@yahoo.com
</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">><br>> Anyway, funny thing is: I was reading some paper<br>> about four or five weeks<br>> ago in which the argument was that enforced
<br>> restrictions on women's<br>> sexuality was a way to spread the babes around so<br>> that all men got a piece<br>> of some action. Can't find it now, or I'd send it<br>> along, but the author (a<br>> feminist) was reciting the major themes of Sb in
<br>> order to argue that it<br>> wasn't necess. hostile to feminist theory and<br>> research.<br><br>In polygamous groups and societies, the "alpha" males<br>do tend to en d up with a dispropotionate share of the
<br>women and lots of males end up with no female<br>partnership (including sex) at all. Taking this as<br>freestanding matter, the purely cultural explanation<br>that first comes to my mind of is that the dominant<br>males would make the concession of monogamy to prevent
<br>discontent among the subordinate males. The problem<br>with this is that lots of polygamous (human) societies<br>have been stable for centuries, and I am not sure that<br>Gramscian considerations about rule by consent rather
<br>than coercion appliy to nonhuman groups at all.<br><br>A sociobiological explanation -- naturally a<br>speculative just so story like almost all evo bio<br>stories -- is that non-alpha males have partially<br>genetically based characteristics that it would bne
<br>useful to the survival of the group, thus of the alpha<br>males themselves, and maybe the females, to pass<br>along, so there may be a partially genetically based<br>dispositions to adopt arrangements where the alpha<br>
males do not monopolize all or almost all the females.<br>The disposition must be pretty weak, since polygamous<br>groups and societies are not uncommon, however.<br><br>><br>> still and all, I wouldn't recommend that Guest use
<br>> this approach as a<br>> pickup line. A surefire way to keep you in need of<br>> giant jars of boy butter<br>> for the foreseeable future.<br>><br>><br>> Bitch | Lab<br>> <a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://blog.pulpculture.org/" target="_blank">
http://blog.pulpculture.org</a><br>><br>> ___________________________________<br>><br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk" target="_blank">
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk</a><br>> <br><br><br>__________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://mail.yahoo.com/" target="_blank">
http://mail.yahoo.com</a><br>___________________________________ <br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk" target="_blank">http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br></span></div>
<div>-- <br>________________________________________<br>`And these words shall then become<br>Like oppression's thundered doom<br>Ringing through each heart and brain,<br>Heard again -- again -- again--<br>`Rise like Lions after slumber
<br>In unvanquishable number--<br>Shake your chains to earth like dew <br>Which in sleep had fallen on you--<br>Ye are many -- they are few.'<br>--------Shelley, "The Mask of Anarchy:<br>Written on the Occasion of the Massacre at Manchester" [1819]
<br><br> </div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>________________________________________<br>`And these words shall then become<br>Like oppression's thundered doom<br>Ringing through each heart and brain,<br>
Heard again -- again -- again--<br>`Rise like Lions after slumber<br>In unvanquishable number--<br>Shake your chains to earth like dew<br>Which in sleep had fallen on you--<br>Ye are many -- they are few.'<br>--------Shelley, "The Mask of Anarchy:
<br>Written on the Occasion of the Massacre at Manchester" [1819]<br><br>