Putnam's suggestion that more flexible work schedules will allow people to tend more to their personal lives is innocuous enough, but elsewhere, he's been issuing far more pernicious analysis of this supposed trend.  Where I attend, he came and gave a talk a few months back and basically said that the increase in ethnic diversity meant more balkanization, less commonality, therefore more social isolation -- which has a really alarming nationalist undercurrent to it.  At a private faculty dinner/meeting with him, he supposedly got super-defensive when pushed to explain.  I think he's published some preliminary writings on diversity-isolatio somewhere, though it is the topic of his next big study. This new social isolation/social capital literature has many possible ramifications, and the key is all in the explanation -- the worst (and least complex) being, as someone once remarked, that poor people just better get better at pulling themselves up by their own bootstraps. <div>On 6/24/06, Ira Glazer <<a href="mailto:ira@yanua.com">ira@yanua.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <a href="http://tinyurl.com/etc5l">http://tinyurl.com/etc5l</a> By Amanda Beck WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Americans are more socially isolated than they were 20 years ago, separated by work, commuting and the single life, researchers reported on Friday. Nearly a quarter of people surveyed said they had "zero" close friends with whom to discuss personal matters. More than 50 percent named two or fewer confidants, most often immediate family members, the researchers said. "This is a big social change, and it indicates something that's not good for our society," said Duke University Professor Lynn Smith-Lovin, lead author on the study to be published in the American Sociological Review. Smith-Lovin's group used data from a national survey of 1,500 American adults that has been ongoing since 1972. She said it indicated people had a surprising drop in the number of close friends since 1985. At that time, Americans most commonly said they had three close friends whom they had known for a long time, saw often, and with whom they shared a number of interests. They were almost as likely to name four or five friends, and the relationships often sprang from their neighborhoods or communities. Ties to a close network of friends create a social safety net that is good for society, and for the individual. Research has linked social support and civic participation to a longer life, Smith-Lovin said. People were not asked why they had fewer intimate ties, but Smith-Lovin said that part of the cause could be that Americans are working more, marrying later, having fewer children, and commuting longer distances. The data also show the social isolation trend mirrors other class divides: Non-whites and people with less education tend to have smaller social networks than white Americans and the highly educated. That means that in daily life, personal emergencies and national disasters like Hurricane Katrina, those with the fewest resources also have the fewest personal friends to call for advice and assistance. "It's one thing to know someone and exchange e-mails with them. It's another thing to say, 'Will you give me a ride out of town with all of my possessions and pets? And can I stay with you for a couple or three months?" Smith-Lovin said. "Worrying about social isolation is not a matter of nostalgia for a warm and cuddly past. Real things are strongly connected with that," added Harvard University Public Policy Professor Robert Putnam, author of "Bowling Alone," a book on the decline of American community. He suggested flexible work schedules would allow Americans to tend both personal and professional lives. * * ___________________________________ <a href="http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk"> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk</a> </blockquote></div>