<div class="style1 style2"><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=5>"<STRONG><FONT size=2>Die fast unlösbare Aufgabe besteht darin, weder von<BR>der Macht der anderen, noch von der eigenen Ohnmacht<BR>sich dumm machen zu lassen." - Adorno<BR><BR>["the almost impossible task consists of this: to not<BR>allow oneself to be made stupid, neither by the power<BR>of the others, nor by one's own powerlessness."]<BR><BR>I think Adorno's statement is a good guiding principle<BR>for these times of our (we = friends of emancipation)<BR>own powerlessness.<BR><BR>Failure to come to terms with this powerlessness leads<BR>to positions taken either in support of Bush's wars or<BR>seeking anti-imperialist sparks of hope in<BR>Ahmadineschad.<BR><BR>Christopher Hitchens/Yoshie Furuhashi: it's the same<BR>response to this problematic situation.<BR></FONT></STRONG></FONT><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3></FONT></div> <div class="style1 style2"><FONT face="Arial,
Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3>For the same line of discussion, see: </FONT></div> <div class="style1 style2"><FONT size=3></FONT> </div> <div class="style1 style2"><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=5><STRONG>Middle East: Cradle Or<BR>Graveyard Of The Empire?</STRONG></FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><STRONG>By Ardeshir Mehrdad</STRONG></FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">15 July, 2006<BR><STRONG>Countercurrents.org</STRONG></FONT></div> <div><STRONG></STRONG> </div> <div><STRONG>...................................</STRONG></div> <div><STRONG>.....................................</STRONG></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Now assuming that the Bush administration has embarked on the third stage of its plan to colonies the Middle East, it should be said that it is deploying more complicated and diverse methods than in the past. Assuming that a future darker than Afghanistan
and Iraq awaits the Iranian people we should return to the principle question of this article: Can one stop Bush's attempts to impose sovereignty in the Middle East and stop another disastrous war?<BR></FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The peoples of Iran and the Middle East have been placed in a perilous situation. Yet they don't face a blind destiny. One can say this with confidence. Stopping Bush's war machine, defeating his domineering intentions are difficult but not impossible.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">If nothing is done, the Middle East is a scene of eternal tragedy, enslavement and captivity. The principle players are fundamentalists of all shapes and sizes Islamists, Jewish or Christian fundamentalists, nationalist and racist groups, a dozen corrupt dictatorial
governments and finally the agents and operators of major oil cartels and arms manufacturers. In such a scenario, the player capable of overthrowing injustice, darkness and dictatorship appears absent. One cannot see a force capable of expressing the wishes and the interests of the masses and this is a serious problem facing the Middle East. The more one avoids confronting this reality, in the name of 'wisdom' or 'realism' the worse the situation will get and the more inevitable the prospect of a major disaster. As long as this shortcoming exists one cannot imagine a Middle East capable of standing up to the US aggression, capable of protecting itself from war, destruction and annihilation.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">One cannot depend on regional states performing miracles. We can obviously set aside the members of the Empire's club, those who in reality act merely as
second hand contractors. However, one should not be optimistic about those states that do not fit in this circle. Not only are these states no different from the others in the region when it comes to repression and dictatorship (often they are amongst the worst), but when confronted by imperialist offensives, they have neither the willingness nor the resolution to stand up to it. Nor do they have the necessary popular base and capability needed for such a confrontation. Amongst the regimes of the region, it would be difficult to find a single example that would not sell its independence and all its citizens' belongings and livelihoods, at the offer of an imperialist 'breathing space. </FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Even when such regimes face the abyss and they are forced to defend themselves, they don't give up the hope for deals and negotiations and they do not miss any opportunity for seeking 'diplomatic initiatives' (26). Rather than their
anti-imperialist rhetoric, the problem of these regimes is their incompetence and inability at playing a sufficiently useful role as servants of the 'New order'. Iran's Islamic regime is a perfect example of such regimes.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Even if we assume that the will and intention to resist imperialism exists, a regime such as Iran's Islamic Republic can only confront a major super power, if it possesses sufficient defenses. It would utter folly to rely on the military power of a third world country to stand up to the US war machine. One cannot imagine that military maneuvers, showing off a few old and new military equipment, even the threat of using weapons of mass destruction can create any hesitations in the intentions of the custodians of the new world order (27). Such quixotic gesturing are merely open invitations to Washington to use its most destructive
weapons with a vicious, barbaric attack without scruple. Such an invitation will pose no inconvenience to the US war machine. It will not affect their 'neo' consciousness.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The weapon of suicide bombings or the use of the Iraqi Shiites as a winning card, can itself become a source of encouragement to launch pre-emptive attacks (28). Irrespective of the usefulness of such tactics and irrespective of the capability of the Iranian regime to use them, one cannot ignore the fact that the threat of terrorist attacks or a religious war will only serve as justification for the theory of 'unlimited war on terror' and a cover for the 'clash of civilizations'. Many amongst influential neo conservatives believe that victory against 'jihadist terrorism' can be achieved by destroying their refuges and states supporting them. Many such ideologues are of the
opinions that the road to victory in Baghdad passes through Tehran and drying up resistance in Iraq requires an attack against Iran and overthrow of the Islamic regime (29). "Real Men" (a name given by neo conservatives to themselves) have argued such ideas for many years. They believe in closing the 'Iran file'.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The sole weapon of any government in confronting imperialist powers is solid and powerful popular resistance and mass mobilization. Without such a support it is absurd to talk of resistance by a third world country. The Islamic regime in Iran has no such weapon nor does it possess the ability to gain one. The fundamental problem of the Islamic regime is not just that it has lost its social backing. More importantly it faces a paradox were it to rely on mobilizing its citizens in the event of an imperialist attack. This regime is unable
to call on Iranians to defend their sovereignty against imperialist aggression, while for decades under the name of the God and Islam violently depriving them from their right to self-governing. Those in power in Iran will not be able to call on Iranians to defend the 'republic' when in the words of its real leaders (individuals such as ayatollah Messbah Yazdi) there is no such thing as a 'republics' in Islam.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">These rulers don't even have enough confidence in themselves to at least make some temporary conciliatory moves towards their own people in order to reduce the divide between them and the majority of people of country. Indeed, their dictatorial, reactionary nature is so overwhelming that as the crisis deepens they are imposing harsher conditions and alienating large sections of the population. If the Iranian state's initial customary resort
to deceit, playing on religious sentiments and demagoguery fails, it has no hesitation to resort to rabid violence and repression.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The 'ayatollahs' and their military commanders have reached such a situation that they are ready to bribe any 'Satan' and accept any indignity to remain in power. Yet in confronting their own people, they cannot afford to show even the kind of flexibility shown by Saddam Hussein on his last days of rule. If in those days the Baathist dictatorship opened prison gates and turned over arms stocks into peoples homes, the Islamic regime considers the current situation as an opportunity to fill its prisons and embark on a new wave of arrest of workers, women, youths, intellectuals, activists of national and religious minorities in an effort to deprive the masses of the only weapon left to them: protest and collective
action.<BR></div></FONT> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Nor can one rely on the intervention of other players on the world stage. There is no doubt that Washington's victory in the Middle East, and especially in Iran, will be a major regional transformation against the interests of some world powers. However one cannot deduce from this that these powers will stand up to the United States. Nor does this mean that they will be able to stop America pursuing its interests. The position of Europe is more or less clear. There is really no reason why they should pursue the policy they had pursued regarding Iraq. They will follow the US either haltingly or running fast behind it.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Russia and China too, despite their current opposition, are capable of using Iran as a lever to gain certain advantages and gain their share of the war booty.
Given the existing relations within the global political power structure, at a time when those in power in the White House have rebelled against common norms of international relations, one cannot imagine that Russia or China's choices will go much beyond non-acceptance and challenging of the US hegemony. Within such limitations, opposition, however serious, does not appear to present an obstacle to Washington's authoritarian tendencies.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Emphasizing internal differences within ruling circles in the United States is also undoubtedly exaggerated. These differences are real. However they are only directed at reducing the error coefficient, avoiding unforeseen consequences. There is little doubt that amongst the US elite there are no principal objections to military intervention in Iran (30). It should be added that none of the political factions has
ruled out military attacks. Differences are essentially limited to the scale and spread of the military operations, the kind of weapons to be used as well as debates on the management of the operation. The questions are more focused on technical issues: is the use of nuclear weapons acceptable? (31) Have all necessary precaution been taken regarding Iran's reaction? Is Donald Rumsfeld capable of managing and leading another military conflict? (32) Within such a framework, although differences can affect the plan for the military operation, its timing or intelligence and diplomatic preparations, it is impossible believe that they will lead to a change in policy and a review of strategic directions.<BR></FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Under present circumstances, therefore, there is little point looking for a force capable of reigning in US aggression within the upper echelons of official power. Such a force to oppose the US must be found
elsewhere: somewhere within the depth of those movements standing up to it. No force in the world, except the region's destitute and poor -- those already "living in hell" - can save the region from the barbarism that awaits it. It is impossible to end the horror show, whose principle players are forces of death, unless wide-ranging, independent and progressive movements completely overturn the situation; and brings the huge power of the people of labor and toil to become engaged in self liberation, self rule and control of their own destiny.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Today Iran is the front line. Neither the victory nor the defeat of the peoples of this country in direct confrontation with one of the most powerful enslaving empires of human history is pre-ordained. The destiny of this battle will depend on answers to two essential questions. Will the majority of the
Iranian people, those who have nothing but their labor power to live for, be able to overcome the subjective and political obstacles challenging their united, decisive and independent movement? Will they be able rise as a powerful and broad movement against ruling reactionaries and the colonial enslavement, and offer a brighter future for Iran? And can these people rely on the active support and solidarity of the millions in the region, and the support of egalitarian and progressive anti war forces throughout the world in the life and death battle against imperialist aggression and reactionary repression? </FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">In answering these questions it must be emphasized that in the current situation in Iran the only force capable of halting imperialism's advance must primarily present a radically different political and structural perspective for the majority
of the population of this country. First and foremost it must convince the millions of Iranian who over the last 28 years have witnessed nothing but injustice and repression by a religious state to conquer apathy and get involved within the ranks of the anti war movement. An inability to unite the struggle against imperialism with the struggle for political freedom and self rule will condemn this movement to becoming an appendage of the regime, isolated and paralyzed (33).</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">It should be noted that without attaining an independent identity, opening an alternative political /structural horizon is impossible. This in itself is dependent on overcoming existing theoretical challenges and defeatist tendencies operating on two opposing fronts and threatens the political space with a clear split. Despite contrary political positions these tendencies share
common ideas. In their perspective, the Iranian people presently have neither the capability nor the potential to self-defense and self-emancipation. Neither can they have any role outside the political games being played by the major powers. Thus any possibility of fighting the US while opposing the Islamic regime is rejected, negating either is proof of the other. In choosing between bad and worse, the only political choice presented to the people is to choose between fundamentalist Islamists and imperialism or between sovereignty and freedom.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">At one extreme, there are those who see Bush's aggression against Iran as the main threat and call on the Iranian people to unite behind the religious state. In their view Iran's reactionary regime is the main force against imperialism and not only any attempt at its overthrow should be set aside but even
weakening its position is tantamount to aiding and abating imperialism. 28 years ago the advocates of this view were in the forefront of the forces justifying the Islamic government's brutal repression of those who fought for freedom, equality and democracy in Iran. They were instrumental in paving the way for the consolidation of one of the most dictatorial and reactionary regimes of the region (34). These same currents have once again become active. Their position that resistance against imperialism is means we should rally round the Islamic regime has damaged the mobilizing power of anti imperialism. It has deprived it of its liberating and progressive content.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">On the other extreme, the Islamic republic is painted as the greater evil. Here we see tendencies which under the guise of defending freedom, directly or indirectly support US
intervention in Iran. In their view a dictatorial and violent regime as the Islamic Republic cannot be overthrown by its people alone. Only foreign intervention and military repression (not unlike Mussolini and Hitler's methods) can crack this regime. Accordingly, in the current world conditions the US government remains the only force willing and capable of bringing about such a change, irrespective of its nature or the specific policies it pursues regarding Iran. In this analysis the opportunity created by the overthrow of the regime through US intervention will allow the Iranian people to participate in politics and take charge of their own destiny.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The least danger of the hold of these two twin-like tendencies in Iran's political scene, particularly amongst certain leftwing forces, will be to turn the current bipolar position into a permanent
situation. The choice between bad and worse simply chokes an independent movement capable of change and liberation. It will close the door on those forces which are capable of breaking down the historic hurdles of enslavement and fear.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Undoubtedly the threat of colonialism is serious. We must stand up to this threat and mobilize all our forces in this struggle. However, to rely on reactionary religion in order to achieve this is tantamount to ignoring the main question. It is to forget that it is precisely the Islamic republic regime that has created the conditions that allow imperialism to question Iran's national sovereignty and take such bold steps towards colonizing the country. Moreover, confronting imperialism from a reactionary fundamentalist viewpoint (even supposing it does not end up in compromise and a sell out deal -- as it has done
in the past) will have no other consequence but to strengthen the religious dictatorship. And this is tantamount to destroying nearly three decades of bloody struggle by workers, students, intellectuals, women, youth and religious and national minorities, groups that have fought for emancipation from this regime.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Clearly the overthrow of this dictatorship is an urgent necessity. Every day that lengthens the life of this regime, engulfs the majority of the people of Iran in further calamity, forcing them to face harsher political and social conditions. Were such accumulated social and political conflicts to remain unresolved, the outcome can be nothing but destruction and desolation. It should be understood, however, that the consequences will not be the same irrespective of who overthrows the Islamic republic regime. Overthrow of the Islamic
regime by Pentagon and the CIA will not bring anything but a continuation of destitution and misery, albeit in other formats.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Let us not forget that the force that has the greatest role in the political overthrow of the Islamic regime will play a crucial role in determining its successor. What can one expect from an alternative regime that seeks to help the construction of a new Empire engineered through cruise missiles and B52 bombers, a force that has officially moved from the globalization of the Middle East towards colonizing it and promises a new era where instead of a new 'Pax Americana' promises a 'new Holocaust'.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Under such circumstances where can one find hope for the establishment of a social and political alternative? It is clear that this global power can replace the current
regime with a variety of alternatives, but none that might serve the interests of LashkarAbad, ZourAbad, Kouye Tollab (some shantytowns in Iran) or an alternative that will bring about a better prospects for a Tabrizi student, a woman in Khoramshahr, a worker in Sanandaj, a tea plantation worker in Lahijan or a child in Zahedan.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Effective resistance against the intervention of the most powerful contemporary imperialist country can only be achieved through an independent, widespread movement: A movement capable of dramatically changing the balance of forces; a movement capable of mobilizing huge power of the down trodden masses, those on the margins of society. This is impossible except by a movement capable of struggle for self determination and self rule, a force capable of uniting the struggles for political freedom with social emancipation,
one capable of presenting a hopeful alternative regarding the lives of millions of deprived and exploited masses. The least cost in failing to achieve such a perspective will be that pseudo-fascistic military-religious groups will to try and manipulate the wave of despair and distress amongst the deprived, and mobilizing sections of the population, help the repressive state and its war machine protect the current system of terror and fear (35). Under these prospects, uniting in a struggle against neo liberal capitalism and the corporate agenda of global domination can become a force capable of mobilizing a true anti imperialist movement.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">And finally confronting the aggressive policies of the United States towards Iran, necessitates the formation of a movement emerging from the multi ethnic, multi-national and multi-religious solidarity movement
that can liberate itself from racial and sexual divisions. A movement that in a country like Iran, riddled with numerous ethnic, religious and gender crises, would be capable of firmly standing up to patriarchy and religious and ethnic hierarchy. Such a movement must be capable of combining the struggles against sexual, national, ethnic and religious discrimination with the struggle against imperialism in order to thwart colonial attempts at misdirecting current disaffections. To call on the peoples of Iran to unite on the basis of collective self rule and regional self determination can create the umbrella organization that recognizes various social movements and unites them in a battle against imperialism (36).</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Progressive and in particular left wing forces, those who believe in socialism, have an undeniable responsibility in taking the first
steps towards such a plan. Responding to this necessity depends on the capability of these groups to overcome mental paralysis, short sighted political views and false opinions, so that they are capable of picturing a new world order. These forces must believe in the power of the masses as well as their own ability to achieve political and social emancipation. They must accept that not only is it disastrous to ignore wider horizons, but overlooking scattered and smaller potentials and failing to unite such forces can also be catastrophic. They should not allow the role of the vanguard to be less than the followers, and the anti-imperialist struggle to degenerate into a mere formalistic or moral duty, good for historic documentation.<BR></div></FONT> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Iranian working class and the toiling masses have both the potential and capability of standing up to US aggression. They can stop their country becoming a protectorate of the
US and its citizens slaves of American multinational corporations. However the ultimate defeat of Washington's plans for the Middle East requires the solidarity and coordinated resistance of the peoples of this region and an active international support movement. Such solidarity is necessary even to dissuade the US from following its "Imperial" project on Iran. Such a movement can only rise from within the radical progressive forces of the Middle East.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">We should not have any illusions about religious and ethnic movements. Such movements cannot stop the disaster engulfing the countries of the region one after the other, indeed they play an important role in the creation if this terrible situation. By dividing the peoples of the region to rival religious and ethnic groups (through creating a wall separating religious from non religious people,
between secular forces and religious forces) and by encouraging conflict between them, these movements have in practice served the interests of imperialist powers (37). Today in the Middle East, the enforcers of the New Order project are confident that they can rely at all times on the support of one nationality or ethnic group against the other. They can seek the cooperation of one religious group to suppress another group. Most importantly they can rely on religious fatwa against all communists and non believers. Today the main function of major Shiite organizations in Iraq or Kurdish nationalist groups in this country has left no doubt the power of religious and ethnic groups in paving the way for imperialist domination and capitalist exploitation.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Middle East requires another movement. One that can challenge religious fundamentalism,
ethnic narrow mindedness, tribal rivalry whilst fighting against Imperialism. One that can strengthen genuine solidarity between the deprived, suppressed Arab, Kurdish, Turkish, Fars, Turkmen, Baluchi people and unite their struggles against imperialist pillage and capitalist enslavement. We must create a common language for the Afghani, Iranian, Pakistani, Iraqi, Tajik, Palestinian worker and toiler. This new movement must create an opportunity for the Assyrian, Armenian and Jewish, Zaratostrian and Muslim, believers and non believers in the region to respect each other in order to open the doors to a new world, ending the era of wars, dictatorships, injustice, poverty and inequality.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The first step is to build an alliance capable of uniting dispersed anti imperialist, anti capitalist struggles. A social forum capable of stopping the isolation
of regional struggles and creating a widespread movement. A movement capable of engaging and involving the revolutionary potentials of women, the youth, students, workers and peasants throughout the region. Unity amongst such movements will create the framework for building national unions and creating multinational movements. The formation of nation-wide trade unions, women and student movements can not only become the backbone of a genuine revolutionary/secular social forum in the Middle East, but is itself a genuine qualitative political metamorphosis in the region. Worker activists, together with progressive women, students, accompanied by writers, artists, journalists and many other social groups whose very existence is being challenged under the present conditions can act now. Although the path ahead is exceedingly difficult, it certainly is not a dead end.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial,
Helvetica, sans-serif">The struggles of the Iranian people and the peoples of the Middle East against Imperialism and reactionary forces are a struggle that will directly influence the destiny of humanity on our planet. In this battle we will either witness the burial of the architects of the New World order of slavery, and their twin allies in the backward religious movements, or the world will succumb to violence and barbarism. There will be few places left in the world that can remain immune to events in the Middle East.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">However it is also true that one can find nowhere on earth where solidarity with the resistance of the peoples of the Middle East will not play a crucial role in the eventual outcome of these events. The anti capitalist movement, anti imperialist movements and especially the international antiwar movement play a vital role in awakening the people and neutralizing the deceptions created by
corporate mass media. These struggles and campaigns can also play an important role in mobilizing the protest movement in the centers of world capital, creating despair and division amongst the US elite and their allies.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">However the experience of the last few years has shown that given the complicated political scene in the region, these campaigns can themselves face contradictions and adopt unworkable positions. Capitulation to the bipolar scene in the Middle East (choosing to side with imperialism or the regimes in the region) can paralyze the anti war movement. Within the framework of such an outlook, some tendencies go as far as not only supporting the regimes of the region in the name of anti imperialism, but also denying the existence of any movement that defines itself in opposition to both imperialism and local regimes. They are silent
against tyrannical regimes such as Iran's Islamic Republic (arguing that one shouldn't find ideological justification for imperialist intervention). In fact such forces are helping to create the disastrous conditions where the protests against poverty, deprivation and dictatorship are suppressed and independent, progressive anti imperialist movements are paralyzed.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Last February and March , in the middle of the 'nuclear debacle', at a time when Washington was trying to justify another military intervention in the Middle East, the Islamic regime in Iran embarked on a new wave of terror and repression of various social forces. Unprecedented violence was used to attack gatherings of protesting bus company employees in Tehran. Workers who were demanding pay rises and the right to set up their independent organizations. Thousands were arrested; women
and children were held hostage and peaceful protest by women celebrating International women's day were attacked by thugs and club-wielding Islamic militia. Security-military forces opened fire on Kurdish and Arab protesters in Sardasht and Ahvaz and some young protesters were executed. "Voice of America' was quicker than any progressive group at condemning these events, the White House issued non-stop statements. However the silence of some in the anti war movement was not once broken.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Whatever the excuse for this reluctance, it is difficult to understand how such actions can strengthen the international antiwar movement or how they can strengthen the anti imperialist movement of the Iranian people. Can one imagine any society where setting up workers organizations is a crime, where demanding a fair wage is an offence punished with imprisonment
and where protesting against discrimination and deprivation is repressed, being capable of confronting imperialism and capitalist plunder? Can one find a better ground for the advance of US tanks than a country where the society is impoverished, repressed, facing religious, national and sexual repression, where society is sinking in a quagmire of addiction and prostitution? If a repressed population can only find Rumsfeld, Rice and Cheney on their side, will they not waver over Washington's adventurous interference in their country?</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">There is no doubt that worldwide protests against Bush' war mongering policies have the potential of becoming an influential power capable of changing the course of events in the Middle East. However the realization of such an aim demands that such protests take place not only against imperialism's war efforts but
also in protest against the dictatorial, repressive policies of corrupt reactionary regimes in the region (38). Success depends on whether anti war anti imperialist movements themselves can become the support base for the creation of an independent, self emancipating movement. A movement capable of making the cradle of the first Empire of the third Millennium it’s grave. Comment</FONT></div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <div><BR>Ardeshir Mehrdad is co-Editor of Iran Bulletin - Middle East Forum .</div> <div> </div> <div></FONT><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">26. Ahmadinejad's letter to George W Bush is a superb glimpse into the real nature of his so-called anti-imperialist slogans. Putting aside the tone and condescending nature of the advice offered at the core of this "diplomatic initiative" was nothing but an official invitation to open the door for dialogue. One might ask what, other than expediency, has persuaded a president who for 28
years has been calling America the Great Satan and marching under the flag of "death to America" to bashfully invite Bush to talks and deals just at the moment when the ultra-conservative Bush regime is plugging Islamic lands with bombs and rockets and openly declares war on the Islamic Republic by putting it at the top of its list of "rogue states". You can see the real core of the way the Islamic Republic views the "Great Satan" when Ahmadinejad bases his invitation to talks not on shared interests of the two people, or even the two governments, but on shared religious beliefs. That is in order to soften the opponent and arrive at an agreement he places his bets on the conservative and fundamentalist core of the Christian-Zionist ideology of Bush and co. What, other than dimwittedness, can persuade some on the left to mistake this for progressive and anti-imperialist populism? </FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">27. A week-long military maneuver
in April in the Persian Gulf where the regime paraded new weapons to present an image of a regional military power with high defensive and offensive potentials. </FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">28. Over the last few months the regime has tried to portray itself as capable of hitting US interests anywhere in the world. An official invitation to join the newly created "martyr brigade", videos by a high ranking security official in the Revolutionary Guards (with a pseudonym of Dr Abbasy) threatening the US with revenge terrorist attacks in case of attack on Iran, and other threats by official Revolutionary Guard commanders are examples. </FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><BR>29. This view is strongly supported by members of the American Enterprise. Michael Ledeen was advocating a military attack on Iran to dry up the roots of Iraqi resistance on the eve of the occupation of the country. Michael A. Ledeen, The War on
Terror Won't End in Baghdad, Wall Street Journal, September 4, 2002. </FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">30. Today the Republican ultra-conservatives have been joined by well known liberal voices in the Democratic Party such as Hillary Clinton in advocating a pre-emptive strike on Iran. </FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">31. Alongside pressures on Russia to prevent sale of military equipment to Iran, there have been open discussion as to the possibility of using nuclear weapons against the country. The debates have now shifted such that the question is not whether an attack on Iran will take place, but whether it will be with conventional or nuclear weapons. While the aim of airing such issues may possibly be to pressurize Russia, it is not inconceivable that there are those in the Pentagon or the White House who have entered the actual use of nuclear
weapons into their calculations. See Seymour Hersh ibid, Saul Hudson, Bush Won't Exclude Iran Nuke Strike, Reuters, April 20, 2006. For an analysis of a nuclear attack on Iran see: Michel Chossudovsky, Nuclear war against Iran, <A href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/">http://www.globalresearch.ca/</A>, January 3, 2006; Aijaz Ahmad, The Imperial nuclear order, <A href="http://www.hinduonnet.com/">http://www.hinduonnet.com/</A>, Vol: 23, Iss: 09, 19-05-2006 </FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">32. Most of the criticisms of the war, particularly those coming from military or security sources, are directed against the weakness of the non-military leadership of the Pentagon. They are accused of a bunker-mentality giving impractical advice out of touch with reality from behind concrete walls. </FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT
face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">33. Interestingly even when many colleagues holding such views were physically purged in the wave of repression by the Islamic regime in the first years of its existence, they were rarely able to embark on a radical critique of the roots of their beliefs. The result was that a section went on bended knees to the opponent's camp and waxed lyrical over the virtues of capitalism and imperialism. Another section sunk into their shells for over 2 decades, becoming bystanders in the political arena, until today's favorable conditions has given them a chance to move again.</FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">34. Undoubtedly, acute crisis in foreign relations and the danger of military conflict and war increasingly favor the emergence and growth of religious-military gangs. With the militarization of the government apparatus a condition may well arise
when the discredited velate faghih (absolute rule of the supreme religious leader) may give way to the absolute rule of military commanders who are presently hiding behind a cloud of populist slogans. This scenario - whether through force or compromise - is most likely if the regime, confronted with the current storm, were for whatever reason to weather the storm for some time. For this reason the control of the Majles-e Khebregan (Assembly of Experts), which elects the Supreme Leader (or Leadership Council) in the forthcoming elections will be critical. See Ardeshir Mehrdad & Mehdi Kia, New -- conservative, regime crisis and political perspective in Iran, Iran Bulletin Middle East Forum, series II, no. 3, December 2005. </FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">35. An example is the various Shiite sects in Iraq. One might well ask whether the role of Ayatollah Sistani or Mohammad
Bagher Hakim in creating conditions for the occupation of Iraq was less than Saddam Hussein or Taha Yassin Ramadan. If one made it easier to occupy the country, the other gave a fatwa sanctioning Iraq's occupation by America and its allies. In the name of Islam, and for the sake of a morsel of power and a constitution that institutionalized religious and sexual tyranny, they sold of the people of Iraq and their interests to Halliburton, Chevron, Bechtel, and Texaco, if not to Christian-Zionist fundamentalism! </FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">36. I have expounded in another article the meaning of participatory democracy and self-government as a progressive and liberating alternative to religious and colonial despotism. I wrote "there are only two roads facing the new order: either become liquidated as an independent political unit or restructure the political power in the
country in such a way as to enable it to confront this "new order". In the current perspectives facing the world it would be difficult to define an alternative. One can say with confidence that the democratic alternative to the Islamic Republic is that political order which is based on strengthening the people in the depths, and their real participation and self-government." And "the real alternative of the ruling power is that structure of power that is decentralized, organized from below, and based on the self-government and participation of all the sections of society in decision making in all the affairs that effect their life. The more direct this influence, the more direct that participation. This is a structure of power that in distributing political and material resources, ends all geographic, ethnic, religious, and sexual differences. Its basis structure are local and regional self-governing societies, and self-government of both production and distribution", See
Ardeshir Mehrdad. Which alternative: Colonial rule or participatory popular sovereignty? Iran bulletin -- Middle East Forum Series II no Zero, Summer 2003 <A href="http://www.iran-buletin.org/">http://www.iran-buletin.org/</A> </FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></FONT> </div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">37. In the current conditions of the world, it is difficult to imagine ethnic nationalism culminating in independent nation-states. On the contrary it is clear that they end up as new colonies, protectorates and city-states under tutelage. Today, rather than a force of national or social liberation, warlords and mercenary armies arise from ethnic nationalism.<BR></FONT></div> <div><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">38. There is no shortage of voices among the anti-war movement that take an independent and progressive stand. See for example Campaign for Peace and Democracy initiated by Michael Albert, Noam Chomsky,
Howard Zinn, Frances Fox Piven and many others. Campaign for Peace and Democracy, <A href="http://www.igc.org/%20">http://www.igc.org/ </A></FONT>For full article see:http://www.countercurrents<STRONG>.org/iran-mehrdad150706.htm</STRONG></div><p> 
<hr size=1>
Copy addresses and emails from any email account to Yahoo! Mail - quick, easy and free. <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/trueswitch/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/trueswitch2.html">Do it now...</a>