<html> <head> <style> P { margin:0px; padding:0px } body { FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma } </style> </head> <body>Joanna, the 9-11 Truth movement is based entirely on trying to find out what actually happened. To be sure, in that process some have arrived at conclusions or developed hypotheses that many on the esablishment left find improbable. But it is simply wrong to say that 'neither side can see a reason to make an effort to find out what actually happened' - what has in fact happened is that those who do try to find out what happened are labelled 'conspiracists' by those who accept unquestiongly the official version despite the proven mendacity of this administration. Joe W. <hr id="stopSpelling">> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:20:00 -0700 > From: 123hop@comcast.net > To: lbo-talk@lbo-talk.org > Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] A question for the anti-"conspiracy"-theorists about 9/11 > > What is interesting to me is that neither side can see a reason to make  > an effort to find out what actually happened. One side deems the call  > for an investigtation "racism" and the other calls it "treason." I hear  > noise both ways. > > Joanna > > > > ravi wrote: > > >Funny to see a bunch of [what I suspect are] white guys > >re-characterizing a simple question from a brown guy as driven by > >anti-brown-skin racism (though I guess the device of "self-hating X" can > >be borrowed from the right). Funnily enough, they are probably correct > >in their analysis (when applied reflectively) that we tend to see what > >we want to see. > > > > --ravi > > > >   > > > > > ___________________________________ > http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk </body> </html>