<DIV>If only all the religionists had a mind like Hegel's.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Best,</DIV> <DIV>Mike B)</DIV> <DIV>********************************************************************************************</DIV> <DIV>From THE PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY intro:</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>The first remark we have to make, and which - though already presented more than<BR>once - cannot be too often repeated when the occasion seems to call for it, - is<BR>that what we call principle, aim, destiny, or the nature and idea of Spirit, is<BR>something merely general and abstract. Principle - Plan of Existence - Law - is<BR>a hidden, undeveloped essence, which as such - however true in itself - is not<BR>completely real. Aims, principles, &c., have a place in our thoughts, in our<BR>subjective design only; but not yet in the sphere of reality. That which exists<BR>for itself only, is a possibility, a potentiality; but has not yet emerged into<BR>Existence. A second
element must be introduced in order to produce actuality -<BR>viz. actuation, realization; and whose motive power is the Will - the activity<BR>of man in the widest sense. It is only by this activity that that Idea as well<BR>as abstract characteristics generally, are realised, actualised; for of<BR>themselves they are powerless. The motive<BR>power that puts them in operation, and gives them determinate existence, is the<BR>need, instinct, inclination, and passion of man. That some conception of mine<BR>should be developed into act and existence, is my earnest desire: I wish to<BR>assert my personality in connection with it: I wish to be satisfied by its<BR>execution. If I am to exert myself for any object, it must in some way or other<BR>be my object. In the accomplishment of such or such designs I must at the same<BR>time find my satisfaction; although the purpose for which I exert myself<BR>includes a complication of results, many of which have no interest for me.
This<BR>is the absolute right of personal existence - to find itself satisfied in its<BR>activity and labour. If men are to interest themselves for anything, they must<BR>(so to speak) have part of their existence involved in it; find their<BR>individuality gratified by its attainment. Here a mistake must be avoided. We<BR>intend blame, and justly impute it as a fault, when we say of<BR>an individual, that he is "interested" (in taking part in such or such<BR>transactions) that is, seeks only his private advantage. In reprehending this we<BR>find fault with him for furthering his personal aims without any regard to a<BR>more comprehensive design; of which he takes advantage to promote his own<BR>full: <A href="http://www.class.uidaho.edu/mickelsen/texts/Hegel%20-%20Philosophy%20of%20History.htm#III">http://www.class.uidaho.edu/mickelsen/texts/Hegel%20-%20Philosophy%20of%20History.htm#III</A>.</DIV><BR><BR>Watch the communist
manifestoon!<br>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1oGIffyVVk<p> 
<hr size=1><a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=43257/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta"> Check out the New Yahoo! Mail </a>- Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.