I want to back Chris up on this  Litvinenko was a real loser. He NEVER proved anything, his claims and acussation led no where. He became a joke and a liability for his handlers. Willingly or otherwise, he did serve the cause in the end! The Kremlin had no interesting in killing Litvinenko - in the the end he was a Kremlin asset. Everytime he spoke out, he made a fool of himself. His paymasters most likely lost interest in him. Only in death would Litvinenko prove his worth. The killers are in London and among his so-called friends. All liars, traitors, and opportunists. I am amazed how Western media has reported on this story without any intelligent reflections. Think about it! Who gains from Litvinenko's death? Chris Doss <lookoverhere1@yahoo.com> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> Quote: "He was also more and more frustrated that the world was not listening to his story." Considering that his story included the claims that the FSB trained Zawahiri and masterminded 9/11, I am not suprised the world did not listen. L was never an insider and was never privy to anything. He was a specialist in telling tall tales. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk </blockquote> <hr size=1>Cheap Talk? <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman8/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com">Check out</a> Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.