[lbo-talk] Paraconsistent indeed

[James Heartfield]

I read this again and again, but still couldn't understand it

"1) Without an exposition of the Absolute [or 'the Absolute'] the claims 
against relativism [or 'relativism'] fall apart due to a 
misdecription/misexplanation is to what most comparative 
historians/ethnographers/political theorists are attempting to do."

Graham Priest has a lot to answer for.