Rakesh wrote:
>You then say Marx's character hardly matters but that's what you were
>focused on.
Marx's character matters less than his work. Nixon's character matters more than his work. With Marx, the work is what counts. With Nixon, the character is the only thing that makes him fascinating. Otherwise, he's just another wartime president.
>You are the one who wants to take cheap shots against Marx
Why is pointing out that someone is a lousy father taking a cheap shot? It is what it is.