> Maybe I read too many newspapers and other current sources, at the
> expense of those dispatches filed from beyond time, but the Dems look
> pretty divided to me. Reid has just come around to a withdrawal
> deadline, a position he rejected until about five days ago.
He got through a $120 bil war-funding bill with a March '08 non-binding date. Now he's rumbling about how if Bush vetoes that, he'll "push" for a bill with a binding date -- still a year in the future. This looks to me a great deal like somebody who wants to _appear_ to be doing something without actually doing it. But who am I to prefer my own judgement to the wisdom of newspapers?