[lbo-talk] (Fwd) IMF v education in Malawi, Moz, Sierra Leone
Patrick Bond
pbond at mail.ngo.za
Wed Apr 18 23:12:15 PDT 2007
(While the Wolf is being hunted, regrettably mainly for semi-prurient
not anti-imperialist reasons, the Rat - IMF boss Rodrigo de Rato - has
sustained the IMF's Grinch function: "Thanks to only about $3 in every
$10 in annual aid increases were programmed to be spent")
*Confronting the Contradictions*
*The IMF, wage bill caps and the case for teachers*
http://www.actionaidusa.org/pdf/AAConf_Contradictions_Final.pdf
By Akanksha A. Marphatia, Rachel Moussié, Anne-Marie Ainger and David Archer
A new report by ActionAid's multi-country International Education Team
and based on in-depth country case studies from Malawi, Mozambique and
Sierra Leone, shows that a major factor behind the chronic and severe
shortage of teachers is that International Monetary Fund (IMF) policies
have required many poor countries to freeze or curtail teacher
recruitment. The IMF may have varying degrees of influence in directly
setting the wage bill ceilings. However, by insisting on overly
restrictive macroeconomic policies that constrain government spending on
wages, it is in part responsible for the persisting teacher shortage. In
all three countries examined, the wage bill ceiling is too low to allow
the government to hire the teachers they need to achieve the
pupil-teacher ratio (PTR) of 40:1 recommended by the Education for All
-- Fast-track Initiative (EFA-FTI). There is considerable evidence that
the current ceilings compromise the quality of education in each of
these countries. There is a growing contradiction between donors who are
trying to "scale-up" aid and spending to train and hire enough teachers
meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and the IMF macroeconomic
policies that are discouraging recipients from spending the new aid.
This contradiction must by confronted by education advocates. For the
full report, click here:
http://www.actionaidusa.org/pdf/AAConf_Contradictions_Final.pdf
...See also: Related New Report from IMF's Independent Evaluation Office
ActionAid's concerns about overly restrictive IMF macroeconomic policies
were affirmed among the key findings of new report by the IMF's
Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) on "The IMF and Aid to Sub-Saharan
Africa," which was recently discussed at the IMF/World Bank spring
meetings in Washington DC. The IEO report analyzed 29 IMF loan programs
between 1999 and 2005, and found that only about $3 in every $10 in
annual aid increases were programmed to be spent, largely because of
extremely conservative monetary policies in IMF programs. This IEO
report and responses by the aid advocacy community are the subject of
ActionAid International USA's latest newsletter, "Policies &
Priorities":
http://www.actionaidusa.org/pdf/PoliciesandPriorities-IFIs-Spring2007issue-1008.pdf
Rick Rowden
Policy Analyst
ActionAid International USA
1420 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005
(202) 370-9918 (tel)
(202) 835-1244 (fax)
www.actionaidusa.org <http://www.actionaidusa.org>
Please note our new address
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list