>The historical existence for an actually existing
>Julius Caesar is thousands of times greater than for a historic Jesus
>what with there being only fabricated evidence for the later.
>You are either misinformed about the nature of secondary and primary
>evidence that exists or you choose to ignore the huge real differences
>between the evidence available.
Aren't you ignoring the huge real differences between ancient oral cultures and our own? What does fabricated evidence mean exactly when you're talking about the ancients? Suetonius didn't fabricate anything?
p.s.
Can we lighten things up a little around here?