[lbo-talk] Incommensurability, phooey (Was Re: Michelangelo , . . . .)

[Eric]

>  > > Even if it were desirable to think in these terms, identity can only
>>  make sense as something that is produced by a subject's ensemble of
>>  functions. How do you separate a thing from what it does?
>
>My point exactly.

Then I don't know how to read. Here's what you wrote in your post on class:


>  Class cannot be defined or explained or recognized by the functions
>  performed by its members,

This seems exactly the opposite of what I wrote but they you are now 
agreeing with. I'm confused.