[lbo-talk] law of value

[Eubulides]

bhandari at berkeley.edu wrote:

> Ian writes:
> 
> "If the deployment of matrix algebra to demonstrate some of the
> inconsistencies of some of Marx' hypotheses isn't enough to convince you
> that Occam's razor is applicable to the ltv, what makes you think you'd be
> convinced by the use of nonlinear diff eqs.?"
> 
> But you're missing the point, not speaking to it: you can't bypass
> value-

==========

I'm not missing the point at all. I'm denying your repeated assertions 
because they are backed up with mathematically inconsistent arguments and 
logically flawed inferences. The lov/ltv are the phlogiston of radical 
political economy.


Ian