[lbo-talk] Contradiction
JBrown72073 at cs.com
JBrown72073 at cs.com
Tue Dec 11 09:37:58 PST 2007
Jim F. write:
>It sounds like Edelman was paraphrasing the quantum physicist Paul Dirac
>who once said of a paper that he had just read that it wasn't even wrong,
>by which he meant that the author had not proposed a hypothesis of theory
>that could be falsified when tested.
>
>Jim F.
Yeah, I've also seen it attributed to Niels Bohr, or Wolfgang Pauli, or...
well, at least it's generally attributed to theoretical physicists.
Jenny Brown </HTML>
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list