On Dec 22, 2007, at 5:57 PM, Michael Pollak wrote:
> <http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2007/12/
> a_huckabee_ally_on_el_rushbo.php>
>
>> "Honestly, because Rush doesn't think for himself. That's not
>> necessarily a slap because he's not paid to be a thinker -- he's an
>> entertainer. I can't remember the last time that he has veered
>> from the
>> talking points from the DC/Manhattan chattering class. If they were
>> praising Huckabee, he would be too."
>
> The second answer to the subject line question (that Clinton would
> be good
> for Rush's business) is more amusing, but this is really the key one.
Yup. It's also kinda funny that the right now has a DC/Manhattan chattering class too. They've achieved senescence!
Doug