[lbo-talk] Krugman

Michael Perelman michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
Sun Dec 23 14:01:37 PST 2007


I have nothing against clarity, but I think you will find a large number of papers spinning their wheels in an attempt to define unproductive labor. Even so, Fred Moseley has used unproductive labor data to make an interesting explanation of downward pressures on profit rates.

On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 09:47:01AM -0800, Rakesh Bhandari wrote:
> Very quickly. The exchange between the Michael Ps confuses me here.
> Perelman (have to use last names) says not to waste time with nice
> distinctions between unproductive workers but then says that only
> some unproductive workers amplify the productive power of capital!
> Then Pollak seems to be saying that more production workers are
> needed for increasing the mass of surplus value (true if s/v is
> fixed) while the fewer the circulation workers, the more productive
> capital is of surplus value.
> I would suggest that analytical clarity is not just a nicety here. It
> goes to the heart of the kind of rationalization capitalism tries to
> achieve. Through a little Marxology we can mean more (and less) by
> rationalization than for example Weberian sociology allows. An
> interesting alternative here is Negri's vision of the total factory
> in which all activity becomes an aspect of the valorization of
> capital--for example the distinction between work or productive and
> free or unproductive time collapses. He and Hardt try to collapse the
> distinction in other ways.
> But I can't say more.
> Rakesh
>
>
> >In a sense, these unproductive workers amplify the productive power
> >of capital, just
> >like capital goods do. Other unproductive workers do not. Perhaps the least
> >productive work on Marxology deals with debates over the niceities
> >of unproductive
> >labor.
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 07:33:49AM -0500, Michael Pollak wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 23 Dec 2007, Seth Ackerman wrote:
> >
> > > If by unproductive you're talking about Marx's idea of unproductive
> > > labor, I'm not enough of a scholar of Marxology to say where retail
> > > workers would fit in his schema
> >
> > They are part of the circulation of capital in Vol 2. They aren't
> > unproductive workers at all. But they are "not production" workers. For
> > Marx, all value is created in production and can only be increased by
> > increasing production. But the more efficient ("productive") the
> > circulation workers are, the fewer of them are needed, and hence the more
> > labor time society has available for production. So in classical Marxist
> > terms, the more productive the sphere of circulation, the more productive
> > society is.
> >
> > Michael
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu michaelperelman.wordpress.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list