[lbo-talk] Marxism, Religion, and Capitalism (was Tariq Ramadan and Islamic Socialism)

Yoshie Furuhashi critical.montages at gmail.com
Sat Feb 24 13:28:04 PST 2007


On 2/16/07, B. <docile_body at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Yeah, there are Muslim socialists, folks who call
> themselves Christian anarchists, or any number of
> things.
>
> About a decade ago I asked an Afghan immigrant, who
> had come to the US by way of Germany and who had a
> B.A. in Economics from that country, if he thought the
> economic ideas outlined in the Qur'an were basically
> socialist. You know, that book that says Jesus was the
> messiah and which appeals to the supernatural for its
> authority.
>
> He told me, no, socialism is socialism, and Islam is
> Islam, each a separate, whole system. One of the 5
> pillars of Islamic faith is giving 10% of one's income
> to the church or to charity. I guess youc ould call
> that welfare if you want. And other principles in the
> Qur'an control other aspects of economic behavior:
> usury or lending at interest is supposed to be
> forbidden, for ex. But so is alcohol or men wearing
> gold. (Wedding doweries, the way meat is processed,
> etc., are also pretty explicitly outlined in the
> Qur'an.) Most of these principles are based upon how
> the nascent Muslim community of Medina operated after
> they were chased from Mecca, in 622 AD.
>
> One could piggy back some hybrid pf socialism on top
> of this, just like when progressive Xtians try
> piggybackmodern anti-capitalism values onto Xtianity.
> You end up with a jumbled & inconsistent mess.

Marxists are fond of saying that religion is compatible with capitalism, and so it is, especially in some hands, but the same can be very well said about Marxism. As a matter of fact, it is probably easier to reconcile Marxism with capitalism than to reconcile religion with it.

Religion, after all, was originally a pre-modern, pre-capitalist phenomenon, so, in order to adapt any variety of it to capitalist life, you have to change it radically, almost beyond recognition sometimes, and that's what people of all religious faiths, fundamentalist and anti-fundamentalist, conservative and progressive, have done with their belief systems.

In contrast, Marxism arose after capitalism, in response to it, and one of its tenets widely held by adherents to Marxism is that transition to socialism first of all demands a great deal of capitalist development, and for many Marxists no amount of capitalist development seems enough foundation for that perpetually postponed transition, even though there is now growing evidence that several more decades of capitalist development may destroy many of the greatest cities of the world: "The melting of just Greenland's ice sheet could raise the worldwide sea level 20 feet" (Brett Clark and John Bellamy Foster, "Is the New UN Global Warming Report Too Conservative?" <http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/cf170207.html>). But you are an anarchist, so I'm no doubt preaching to the converted when it comes to compatibility of Marxism and capitalism. :-> -- Yoshie <http://montages.blogspot.com/> <http://mrzine.org> <http://monthlyreview.org/>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list