On Jan 12, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Wojtek Sokolowski wrote:
> [WS:] I think you are making some heroic assumptions how people read
> messages posted to this list. The above seem to assume that people
> read the
> latest messages first and then proceed to earlier postings, because
> only
> that sequence implies a violation of the ruling 1hr20min ago. If
> people
> read earliest messages first, as I do, starting from those posted
> yesterday
> night, how on earth are they supposed to know what was posted 1hr
> 20min ago?
I said at 7:30 last night, 13 1/2 hours ahead of time, that the thread was coming to an end at 9 AM New York time today. I repeated it a little later. I repeated it again at about 8 this morning. I don't know how many more times I could have reasonably said it.
Doug