helpful, also, to understand that the clitoris isn't only about the button. i took those pics, btw, and turned them into star wars spaceships. http://blog.pulpculture.org/2006/09/22/3d-vulva/
At 02:24 PM 1/23/2007, Charles Brown wrote:
>I'm not going to get much into the v. orgasm/pleasure issue, except to say
>the stats from the one study can be interpreted as overwhelming majority of
>females have physical _capacity_ for it, which projected back tens of
>thousands of years in a non-male supremacist social context would mean
>something quite different with respect to receptivity to v. intercourse.
>
>Evolutionary/natural selection explanation of the origin of the c. is not an
>explanation of "everything" . It is an explanation of "one" thing. Any trait
>that increases likelihood of having fertile intercourse ,and therefore
>improves differential fertility "score" is _very, very_ likely to be
>explained by a natural selection hypothesis. Differential fertility is even
>more important than differential mortality in impacting fitness. Any trait
>that increases fertile intercourse is very likely to have arisen through a
>natural selection mechanism, unlike any and every other trait that doesn't
>impact amount of fertile intercourse.
>
>In other words, c is unlikely to be a Gouldian spandrel trait.
>
>
>CB
>
>
>
>
>
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
"You know how it is, come for the animal porn, stay for the cultural analysis." -- Michael Berube
Bitch | Lab http://blog.pulpculture.org