The KLA were regarded (by UK Times among others) as a bunch of narcotrafficking thugs who probably owed their existence to CIA funds and arms. Regardless, the bombing of Serbia, targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure (as Wesley Clark likes to brag) in flagrant violation of the Geneva Convention laws, was supported with overwhelming enthusiasm by liberals and opposed, on no principled grounds, by conservatives.*
Serbia had a functioning, if corrupt (like all governments I know of), government destroyed and has been plunged into lawlessness, and Serbs in Kosovo have been rounded up and put in what amount to concentration camps. (Even Bosnia-Herzegovina has little in the way of government, apparently surviving, to the extent that it does, mainly on E.U. handouts--the blue "a gift from E.U." trams you see there, e.g.)
The NATO/Kosovo War is not significant because it was particularly terrible (Iraq is much worse, of course), it is significant because it shows that imperial power-lust is bipartisan. When a country defies it's master, the U.S., as Milosovich had the misfortune to do, punishment (of the civilians) is in order. (N.B.: The sanctions on Iraq that caused about a million "excess" deaths also seems to have been a calculated act of terrorism aimed at the civilians.)
It is time to put and end to what Jean Bricmont calls "Humanitarian Interventions"; it is time to face up to reality and oppose all crimes of State regardless what noble cause they are committed in the name of.
If Al Gore, saviour du jour, is seroius about reconciliation of past mistakes he should recuse himself to the International Court of Justice, along with accomplices Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright, to stand trial for war crimes.
*Most of the Kosovo atrocities followed, as predicted, the bombing campaign and amounted to about 10,000 deaths. Prior to the war there were about 2,000 deaths.
***
Peter Ward Brooklyn, NY