[lbo-talk] Incentive to work (Was Re: Liberal Intellectuals and the Coordinator Class)

Robert Wrubel bobwrubel at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 11 16:59:24 PDT 2007


I dont know why I used "incentive to work" at all. It's definitely a creepy sword held over our heads by establishment economists, like the old parental whip "you'd better do well on your finals!!!" As if we didnt have plenty of incentive already, as Andie says, just to keep our jobs.

--- andie nachgeborenen <andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com> wrote:


> >
> > If you use progressive taxation to control the
> > accumulation of wealth, then you might take away
> the
> > incentive to work. It would be a matter of very
> > fine-tuning.
>
> There's a good deal of evidence that what matters to
> "incentive to work" is pretax income, actually.
>
> And then there's the obvious fact that if you
> reduce
> people's net income by taxation you give them an
> obvious incentive to work more so the net is higher!
> I
> think Geoffrey Hazard once wrote a paper about that,
> no one paid any attention.
>
> Also there's the curious point about diminishing
> marginal returns ("DMR") that advocates of unlimited
> accumulation never get. An extra 50 dollars is a lot
> of money to someone earning $33,000 a year, like
> teachers in Waukegan, IL, but because an extra
> million
> dollars is chicken feed to Bill Gates, it doesn't
> provide him any significant additional incentive to
> monopolize the software market and violate the
> antitrust law bundling bad software that you have to
> buy. So, if you think that people are mainly
> motivated
> to work by extra money, and you want people to work,
> you want your incentives front-loaded, progressivity
> is a reflection of this obvious fact.
>
> Fact is, we don't provide incentives to work,
> mainly,
> by giving more money, except to them as don't need
> it
> because (a) their jobs are relatively desirable,
> intrinsically rewarding, or compensated in
> nonmonetary
> terms (like prestige), or (b) because DMR means that
> extra money doesn't matter that much to them as
> income
> as opposed to a way of keeping score.
>
> We do it on the One Bullet Manager theory that
> Terrified People Are More Productive: for most
> people
> it's not the carrot of extra income, but the stick
> of
> joblessness and destitution that drives them to the
> rat race.
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.
> Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us.
>
http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
>
>
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list