[lbo-talk] Facing the Hard Truths about Energy

Yoshie Furuhashi critical.montages at gmail.com
Thu Jul 19 23:55:08 PDT 2007


The National Petroleum Council's latest report, _Facing the Hard Truths about Energy_, ought to give everyone second thoughts about sanctions on Iran: demand is projected to out-pace supply (barring a global depression, of course). But if Washington had the kind of power elite who could think of anything other than their class power, it would not have destroyed Iraq and its oil industry with sanctions and war. Most likely, the hard truths would just make them redouble efforts to make regime change and denationalize oil in Iran. -- Yoshie

National Petroleum Council Facing the Hard Truths About Energy: A Comprehensive View to 2030 of Global Oil and Natural Gas 18 July 2007

Press Release <http://www.npc.org/7-18_Press_rls-post.pdf> Executive Summary <http://downloads.connectlive.com/events/npc071807/pdf-downloads/Facing_Hard_Truths-Executive_Summary.pdf> Report Excerpts Presented at the July 18 Council Meeting <http://downloads.connectlive.com/events/npc071807/pdf-downloads/Facing_Hard_Truths-Excerpts.pdf> Draft of the Full report <http://downloads.connectlive.com/events/npc071807/pdf-downloads/Facing_Hard_Truths-Report.pdf>

<http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0a6e6b54-3550-11dc-bb16-0000779fd2ac,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F0a6e6b54-3550-11dc-bb16-0000779fd2ac.html&_i_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.google.com%2Fnews%3Fq%3DThe+study%2C+calling+on+the+US+to+implement+such+radical+measures+as+the+fastest+technically+possible+increase+in+vehicle+fuel+economy+standards+and+an+international+framework+for+managing+carbon+dioxide+emissions%2C+echoed+familiar+demands+from+environmental+campaigners.> High oil prices threaten to linger By Ed Crooks Published: July 18 2007 18:33 | Last updated: July 18 2007 18:33

<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/18/business/18cnd-oil.html> Oil Industry Offers Sobering Outlook on Supply By JAD MOUAWAD Published: July 18, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Because the world's population is growing and living standards are rising worldwide, energy consumption globally is expected to rise by more than 50 percent over the next 25 years. But finding supplies to match that growth is going to be increasingly tough, and will require vast new investments in coming decades.

The council's report warns of "accumulating risks" to energy production, including rising geopolitical barriers, inflation in costs, dwindling petroleum engineers, and growing constraints on carbon dioxide emissions. Although it does not say so explicitly, the subtext of the council's study suggests that high energy prices might be here to stay.

<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/16/AR2007071601466.html> Report: Demand to Outpace Crude Supplies

By H. JOSEF HEBERT The Associated Press Monday, July 16, 2007; 9:25 PM

WASHINGTON -- Conventional crude oil supplies won't keep up with growing global demand in the next 25 years and other fuels from ethanol to liquefied coal and oil from tar sands will be needed to close the gap, says a draft oil industry report.

The draft report by the National Petroleum Council, an advisory group to the federal government, is unusual in its emphasis on the need for a broad range of supplemental fuels and conservation to meet future petroleum needs.

The document, titled "Facing the Hard Truths about Energy," is to be approved by the 175-member council Wednesday and then presented to Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman. A copy was provided to reporters Monday.

The council is made up of a cross-section of oil industry executives and other energy experts selected by the energy secretary to advise the department. Its chairman is Lee Raymond, retired chief executive of Exxon Mobil Corp.

The report projected continued growth of conventional global crude oil production but said that it would not be enough to meet demand.

"It's a hard truth that the global supply of oil and natural gas from the conventional sources relied upon historically is unlikely to meet projected 50 to 60 percent growth in demand over the next 25 years," says the report.

<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118454442678367140.html?mod=googlenews_wsj> Potential Energy Crunch May Bring Other Fuels to Fore By BHUSHAN BAHREE July 16, 2007; Page A2

World oil and gas supplies from conventional sources are unlikely to keep up with rising global demand over the next 25 years, the U.S. petroleum industry says in a draft report of a study commissioned by the government.

In the draft report, oil-industry leaders acknowledge the world will need to develop all the supplemental sources of energy it can -- ranging from biofuels to nuclear power to oil extracted by unconventional means from the oil sands of Canada -- to meet soaring demand. The surge in demand is expected to arise from rapid economic growth in such fast-developing countries as China and India, as well as mounting consumption in the U.S., the world's biggest energy market.

• Tight Times: World oil and natural-gas supplies are unlikely to keep up with rising demand over the next 25 years, the U.S. petroleum industry says in a draft report. • Needed Alternatives: The world will need supplemental sources like biofuels and nuclear power to meet demand, the report says. • Price Pressure: The findings suggest high energy prices are likely for decades to come.

The findings suggest that, far from being temporary, high energy prices are likely for decades to come.

"It is a hard truth that the global supply of oil and natural gas from the conventional sources relied upon historically is unlikely to meet projected 50% to 60% growth in demand over the next 25 years," says the draft report, titled "Facing the Hard Truths About Energy."

"In geoeconomic terms, the biggest impact will come from increasing demand for oil and natural gas from developing countries," said the draft report, a copy of which was reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. "This demand may outpace timely development of new supply sources, thereby pressuring prices to rise."

The study, which was requested by U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman in October 2005, was conducted by the National Petroleum Council, an industry group that advises the secretary.

The conclusions appear to be the first explicit concession by the petroleum industry that it alone can't meet burgeoning global demand for oil, which may rise to as much as 120 million barrels a day by 2030 from about 84 million barrels a day currently, according to some projections. (U.S. gasoline prices are on the rise. See related article.)

These conclusions follow hard on the heels of a medium-term outlook by the Paris-based International Energy Agency this month, which suggested a supply squeeze will hit by 2012. The fact that the American petroleum industry is warning of a crunch could have an even greater impact on the debate over energy policy.

[Chart] <http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/NA-AN435A_OilCr_20070715195634.gif>

The draft report proposed that the U.S. work not only to increase output of oil, gas and other fuels, but to cut energy use by improving car and truck mileage standards and implementing stricter building and appliance requirements. "Whether we are effort-constrained or resource-constrained won't become clear until it is too late," said Larry Goldstein, director of the Energy Policy Research Foundation, an industry-funded, nonprofit research organization based in Washington. Policy makers must assume supply constraints, Mr. Goldstein said, declining to comment directly on the study.

The National Petroleum Council has about 175 members, picked by the energy secretary, with extensive participation by the energy industry and other industries and government officials and with help from foreign countries and institutions. The NPC is slated to vote on adopting the draft, which runs more than 450 pages, including annexes, at a meeting Wednesday in Washington to be led by Exxon Mobil Corp. former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Lee R. Raymond.

Some people who participated in the report declined to comment on the findings until the results were published. Besides Mr. Raymond, leaders of the study included David J. O'Reilly, chairman and chief executive of Chevron Corp.; Andrew Gould, chairman and CEO of Schlumberger Ltd.; and Daniel H. Yergin, chairman of Cambridge Energy Research Associates.

Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy and Economic Research, said this is perhaps the first time the NPC, which was founded at President Harry Truman's request in 1946, has taken a global overview. The conclusion seems to be "the situation is serious, but not critical," Mr. Lynch said.

Still, drastically increasing the supply of oil and gas could be difficult. "The oil industry was gutted between 1985 and 2000 because of low prices," said J. Robinson West, chairman of PFC Energy, an industry consulting concern in Washington. "It will be difficult now for it to meaningfully increase its production capacity."

"The fact is there is lots of oil in the world, but the industry and international capital can't reach it," Mr. West said, noting limits imposed on Western companies by holders of oil reserves in the Mideast and elsewhere.

Houston investment banker Matthew Simmons takes a pessimistic view. He believes the world should be preparing for sharply lower oil production. He points out the NPC study didn't squarely address one important issue raised by Mr. Bodman in requesting the study: the point at which global oil production will plateau and then begin to decline, often referred to by the shorthand term "peak oil."

"We should be preparing for a time when, in 10, 15 or 20 years, oil production is likely to be 40 million barrels a day to 60 million barrels a day, not 120 million," he said.

The NPC study noted that total global endowment of fossil fuels appears to be huge, but only a fraction of those estimated volumes can be produced, because of technical constraints. It said the Earth's underground stores of oil were estimated at 13 trillion barrels to 15 trillion barrels.

--Jeffrey Ball contributed to this article.

Write to Bhushan Bahree at bhushan.bahree at wsj.com -- Yoshie



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list