[lbo-talk] Taibbi (was Re: Fwd: Antioch College Closing!)

joanna 123hop at comcast.net
Mon Jun 18 01:13:12 PDT 2007


When you live in a world of atomized "individuals," it is not possible even to imagine empathy....and the only politics that makes sense is a politics based on "individual" identity. Possibly the last chapter of "divide and conquer."

Joanna

Miles Jackson wrote:


>Brian Charles Dauth wrote:
>
>
>
>>>Race, sex, sexual preference are all tied up with the distribution of
>>>
>>>
>>property and the division of labor.
>>
>>But Doug, you have to actually live life and not just theorize it to
>>understand this. But some people are content to be keyboard
>>jockeys and opine from the safety of a home office.
>>
>>
>
>This argument is precisely analogous to the claim that a medical doctor
>could not understand the etiology of a disease unless the doctor
>personally experienced the disease. Being able to thoroughly analyze a
>phenomenon and test causal linkages is not dependent on having an
>immediate "personal" experience. This assumption that a person cannot
>"know" something unless they personally experience it is one of the most
>pernicious misconceptions about knowledge that I come across as a
>college prof.
>
>Miles
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>>And it's a phenomenal fact that people experience their lives
>>>
>>>
>>through these "identity" categories. You can tell them all you
>>like that it's a delusion, and it's really all about class, but
>>you've got to do a lot of analytical and rhetorical work to make
>>that clear.
>>
>>Or maybe build on their actual exprience of these identities so
>>that they then expand to an inclusion/creation of a class identity.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>And there are a lot of important things that class doesn't really
>>>
>>>
>>touch - like the privilege of visiting your sick partner in the ICU.
>>
>>And because you have been refused entrance, the man whom your
>>mother came to call her third son is put on machines he never
>>wanted to be on because you were denied access.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>I think identity politics marked the end of class struggle -- that
>>>
>>>
>>it coopted the legitimate grievances of women and minorities
>>
>>I always thought being murdered was a legitimate grievance. The
>>things you learn on lbo-talk.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>I am not sure what there is to get here.
>>>
>>>
>>The fact that in anti-queer culture, the likelihood of violence against
>>queers increases. In fact, if you want to help the elite do its work,
>>you oppose efforts to end sexism, racism and anti-queer hatred.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>A [genuine] question: what is the basis of solidarity? Surely it is
>>>
>>>
>>more than back-scratching?
>>
>>Why does it have to be more than that? By working to alleviate the
>>real life oppression I suffer and my doing the same in return, a great
>>of solidarity can be brought about (you have to unattach yourself from
>>your keyboard to do so, of course).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>They are under the delusion that there is some magic formula which
>>>
>>>
>>will instantly revive The Left
>>
>>It is the desire for some Party Line they can prostrate themselves before
>>which I do not see coming back any time soon (maybe never). Pluralism
>>looks like a permanent fixture of the future.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>more or less deliberately avoiding the fact that criticisms of or policies
>>>
>>>
>>for The Left are empty until there is something (probably a loose coalition,
>>but an identifiable one) that can be called The Left.
>>
>>However, The Left re-emerges, I doubt it will be similar to Lefts of the
>>past.
>>Time to throw the wayback machines on the scrap heap.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Capitalism is possible w/o the oppression of gays, blacks, women and
>>>
>>>
>>national minorities
>>
>>Is it?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>but you can't have capitalists or capitalist society w/o workers.
>>>
>>>
>>Agreed, but you also need scapegoats in capitalism.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>I tried to explain this to Rorty, but he remained, as
>>>
>>>
>>I told him to his considerable resentment, a vulgar
>>"Marxist" to the core, unshakable in his belief that
>>all of us are really fairly directly linked in our
>>behavior to our economic interests understood in
>>pretty narrow terms as wages and benefits.
>>
>>Throwing reality in Rorty's face? No wonder you were
>>offered no roses.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>so what do we do with racist homophobic white union activists?
>>>
>>>
>>who then is engaging in identity politics at the expense of class
>>struggle?
>>
>>Sing out Louise!
>>
>>Brian
>>
>>
>>___________________________________
>>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>>
>>
>>
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list