Neither do I. I don't understand the necessity for any confusion, all confusion being by definition surplus to requirements. However, I take your point, and apologise if I led anyone to think that we should 'defend' the regime in Iran. For the record, I fully support the Iranian workers and students when they resist the state, as well as the Iranian capitalist elite of which it is the executive arm.
But why should I have to stipulate that every time I point out that we shouldn't necessarily believe even 50% of what's in the New York Times on such a sensitive topic as Iran? Am I being submitted to a Yoshie-Test, here? It's enough to make someone explode (not literally, of course, before anyone gets confused about that too).