--- Dwayne Monroe <idoru345 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Jordan:
>
>
> The big point about the current direction the
> surveillance is headed is that it's not even
> targeted:
> it's just a sweep of all the bits at all the places
> that are available. That phone call you made today
> will not be the subject of an investigation. But it
> will be available in the future, when you do step
> out
> of line, in whatever way you will.
>
> ..................
>
>
> Precisely right.
>
>
>
>
> Contemporary forms of "surveillance" are built upon
> cheap data storage and ubiquitous computing. As you
> say Jordan, immediate 'investigation' has little to
> do
> with it; 'data harvesting' and 'data warehousing'
> for
> potential future use are the actual goals.
>
>
> This was the design assumption of the Total
> Information Awareness program (officially killed,
> but
> lingering in an undead state, its spirit scattered
> across various smaller efforts).
>
>
> Imagine a massively parallel data storage network,
> not
> like Google's, dedicated to logging electronically
> traceable actions -- phone calls, emails, credit and
> debit card transactions, flights, etc.
>
>
> Now, stop imagining and realize that this is what
> has
> been made possible by inexpensive, high gigabytage
> hard drives, improved search algorithms and
> relatively
> cheap, yet remarkably powerful CPUs.
>
>
>
>
> .d.
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/